2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-71292-1_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement and Usability of Conversational Search – A Study of a Medical Resource Center Chatbot

Abstract: Due to advances in natural language understanding, chatbots have become popular for assisting users in various tasks, for example, searching. Chatbots allow natural-language queries, which can be useful in case of complex information needs, and they provide a higher level of interactivity by displaying information in a dialog-like format. However, chatbots are often only used as auxiliaries for a graphical search user interface (SUI). Thus, they must be engaging and usable so that users both want to and are ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These experiments measured usability characteristics referred to effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction as shown in Table 1. Some of the primary studies ( [19], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]) consider all three of these aspects, others ( [24], [25], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]) investigate efficiency and satisfaction, others again ( [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]) consider only satisfaction, whereas only one ( [46]) evaluated both effectiveness and satisfaction. Satisfaction is again the usability characteristic of most concern to researchers since it is evaluated most often.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments measured usability characteristics referred to effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction as shown in Table 1. Some of the primary studies ( [19], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]) consider all three of these aspects, others ( [24], [25], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]) investigate efficiency and satisfaction, others again ( [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]) consider only satisfaction, whereas only one ( [46]) evaluated both effectiveness and satisfaction. Satisfaction is again the usability characteristic of most concern to researchers since it is evaluated most often.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both chatbots, the level of reuse intention and recommendation for others stated by participants were not as high as expected. [PS25] This study aims to compare the conversational search user interface (chatbot) of a medical resource center database with its graphical search user interface in terms of user engagement and usability.…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the adoption of usability scales varies a lot in chatbot usability experiments, because it mainly depends on the research goal and chatbot type.Researchers developed multiple questions for self-designed questionnaires according to their research topics and measurements. For example, researchers developed, based on the SUS questionnaire, the Voice Usability Scale for speechbased systems, as SUS does not comprehensively account for several characteristics that are unique to a voice environment[PS18].Most experiments used standardized usability scales (like Affective Slider [PS1], ResQue model [PS3], [PS19], SUS [PS6], [PS8], [PS14], [PS17], SUMI [PS13], AdjectiveRating Scale[PS18], Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use questions[PS23], User Engagement Scale[PS25]), whereas scales cited in national and international standards (SUS and SUMI) were adopted in only five experiments.The chatbot usability experiment correlates to chatbot development. In general, evaluations of chatbot usability were considered as a part of the software development process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software engineering experts designed the ideal class diagram before the experiment was carried out. To assess quality, we employed the following metrics [24]: Precision = TP / (TP + FP) TN (true negative): There are no true negatives in the model comparison; hence, the value is always 0.…”
Section: A Objectives Hypotheses and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%