Engagement and attrition with eHealth tools for remote monitoring in chronic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

ObjectivesAlthough eHealth tools are potentially useful for remote disease monitoring, barriers include concerns of low engagement and high attrition. We aimed to summarise evidence on patients’ engagement and attrition with eHealth tools for remotely monitoring disease activity/impact in chronic arthritis.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted for original articles and abstracts published before September 2022. Eligible studies reported quantitative measures of patients’ engagement with eHealth instruments used for remote monitoring in chronic arthritis. Engagement rates were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.ResultsOf 8246 references, 45 studies were included: 23 using smartphone applications, 13 evaluating wearable activity trackers, 7 using personal digital assistants, 6 including web-based platforms and 2 using short message service. Wearable-based studies mostly reported engagement as the proportion of days the tracker was worn (70% pooled across 6 studies). For other eHealth tools, engagement was mostly reported as completion rates for remote patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The pooled completion rate was 80%, although between-study heterogeneity was high (I293%) with significant differences between eHealth tools and frequency of PRO-collection. Engagement significantly decreased with longer study duration, but attrition varied across studies (0%–89%). Several predictors of higher engagement were reported. Data on the influence of PRO-reporting frequency were conflicting.ConclusionGenerally high patient engagement was reported with eHealth tools for remote monitoring in chronic arthritis. However, we found considerable between-study heterogeneity and a relative lack of real-world data. Future studies should use standardised measures of engagement, preferably assessed in a daily practice setting.Trial registeration numberThe protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021267936).

Effectiveness and feasibility of a mobile health self-management intervention in rheumatoid arthritis: study protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (AEGORA)

“…However, despite its potential advantages, using mHealth to deliver self-management interventions for RA raises its own specific issues, including the well-established challenge of ensuring durable user engagement with smartphone apps [ 29 ]. Moreover, qualitative studies have suggested a possible negative effect of mHealth interventions on patients’ perceptions regarding illness and symptoms [ 32 , 51 ], although quantitative evidence to support these concerns remains limited and conflicting [ 52 , 53 ].…”

“…Nevertheless, providing self-management interventions for RA through mHealth raises several challenges. For one, studies have reported large variations in user engagement with mobile apps in clinical practice [ 29 , 30 ]. While motivational principles like gamification are often proposed as potential solutions to this problem, most existing mHealth-apps do not include these features [ 31 ].…”

“…Secondly, qualitative studies have suggested that mHealth-apps might induce negative perceptions and anxiety by increasing patients’ focus on symptoms [ 32 , 33 ]. To date, however, research regarding these effects remains scarce and conflicting [ 29 ]. Finally, the content of self-management interventions differs widely across published studies, most interventions are insufficiently supported by a theoretical framework, and mHealth remains underrepresented in the literature as an approach to deliver self-management interventions for inflammatory arthritis [ 34 ].…”

Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide

“… 1 In 2018, over 325 000 health apps were developed, 2 covering many health conditions and targeted behaviours. For example, mHealth apps can help to support self-management of conditions like diabetes, 3 facilitate remote monitoring of patients with chronic conditions 4 or support patients with general behaviour change such as increasing/monitoring physical activity 5 or dietary change. 6 Some health apps also support public health initiatives, such as promoting healthy lifestyles and encouraging the uptake of screening and vaccination programmes.…”

Mobile and Web-Based Partnered Intervention to Improve Remote Access to Pain and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Management: Recruitment and Attrition in a Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Remotely and electronically available interventions and disease monitoring methodologies have significant variability in attrition rates, revealing unique barriers to these interventions compared with traditional in-person treatment options [ 16 , 17 ]. Attrition is also a notable limitation in chronic pain and PTSD intervention studies.…”