2014
DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2014.969746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaged patients, engaged partnerships: singles and partners dealing with an acute cardiac event

Abstract: A few studies examine patients' (and partners') individual and relational functioning after an acute cardiac event and no research focuses on the individual and relational factors associated with the patient's engagement in his/her disease management. The present study aimed at exploring these variables in male and female patients as well as their partners. We pursued our objectives by taking advantage of a dyadic research design that involved both partners in the data collection, when present, and by includin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings of the APIM analyses suggest that the more one (patient or partner) perceives his or her spouse as being supportive, the lower his/her levels of CISC behavior. This finding is consistent with studies showing that one's perception of one's partner's responses as being negative or unsupportive is associated with one's own greater autonomous management of treatment, 33 holding back, and cognitive and behavioral avoidance from thoughts and feelings about cancer. 5,20,21 It would therefore seem that a supportive response from a partner reduces one's need to conceal cancer-related issues.…”
Section: The Actor-partner Interdependence Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Findings of the APIM analyses suggest that the more one (patient or partner) perceives his or her spouse as being supportive, the lower his/her levels of CISC behavior. This finding is consistent with studies showing that one's perception of one's partner's responses as being negative or unsupportive is associated with one's own greater autonomous management of treatment, 33 holding back, and cognitive and behavioral avoidance from thoughts and feelings about cancer. 5,20,21 It would therefore seem that a supportive response from a partner reduces one's need to conceal cancer-related issues.…”
Section: The Actor-partner Interdependence Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For YAC patients, a lack of social support was associated with health, emotional, mental, and depressive issues and lower QoL (Joubert et al, 2013 ; Bucholz et al, 2014 ; Leung Yinko et al, 2014 ). These results are consistent with the literature in older patients for whom the presence of friends, family, and partners seems crucial after the appearance of a cardiac disease (Kristofferzon et al, 2008 ; Bertoni et al, 2015 ; Ooi et al, 2016 ). According to the findings, young patients (≤40 years old) may be more at risk of isolation after the implant of an ICD (Dubin et al, 1996 ; Sears et al, 2009 ; Larimer et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, optimizing the partners functioning may not only benefit the partner, but the patient as well. Suboptimal adaptation of the partner to the patient’s illness may negatively influence the partners’ engagement in the patient’s care [48]. Furthermore, low partner support can lead to less treatment adherence or fewer favorable lifestyle changes made by the patient [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%