2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1807.05705
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ENG: End-to-end Neural Geometry for Robust Depth and Pose Estimation using CNNs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the sequence length beyond a sequence length of 5 examines its ability to generalise beyond the length of the training sequences. Both DeepVO [39] and ENG [11] lack an internal map representation to localise against and similarly both methods suffer from a larger accumulated drift towards the end of the sequence. MapNet [19] fairs better, although suffers from inaccuracies due to cell quantisation and false pose modalities which appear over longer periods of time.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Increasing the sequence length beyond a sequence length of 5 examines its ability to generalise beyond the length of the training sequences. Both DeepVO [39] and ENG [11] lack an internal map representation to localise against and similarly both methods suffer from a larger accumulated drift towards the end of the sequence. MapNet [19] fairs better, although suffers from inaccuracies due to cell quantisation and false pose modalities which appear over longer periods of time.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Doom dataset, we compared our framework against DeepVO [39] and MapNet [19], both which maintain an internal representation of previously seen observations. Additionally, we compared our models against a recent state-of-the-art frame-to-frame approach ENG [11]. For the AVD dataset, we also compare with a mature classic SLAM baseline, an RGB-D implementation of ORB-SLAM2 [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations