2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781119321682.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enforcing of Mechanical Properties of Alumina Foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7,16] This is questionable, as no information is given about the distribution and localization within the foam of the added material. Investigations with m-CT on specimens infiltrated by A50 proved, that only a part of the struts is filled, a significant difference to the fully infiltrated struts of B65 specimens (Figure 2).…”
Section: Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[7,16] This is questionable, as no information is given about the distribution and localization within the foam of the added material. Investigations with m-CT on specimens infiltrated by A50 proved, that only a part of the struts is filled, a significant difference to the fully infiltrated struts of B65 specimens (Figure 2).…”
Section: Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Unfortunately, it is not possible to compare the strength directly, due to different measuring geometry, sample geometry (size, relative density, cell size), or other missing measurement parameters. [7,16,18] The Weibull moduli m range from 1.9 to 5.7 and exhibit no obvious correlation to varied parameters (T max1 , T max2 , colloid, infiltration technique; Table 2). The scattering range suggests an influence of the sample preparation, but differences in preparation were not identified, and the Weibull moduli as calculated are in the range as reported for comparable cellular materials.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations