2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2007.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enforcement of boundary conditions in meshfree methods using interpolating moving least squares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In data preparation stage, the following are determined (a) geometry and material physical properties of the subregions, (b) a nodal distribution for discretizing the full domain, (c) the domain of influence for each node, (d) the number and size of the integration cells, and the number of integration points inside each integration cell, (e) support domain for each integration point, (f) weights, shape functions, and shape function derivatives, for each node in the entire region, (g) nodes and integration points along electrodes, and (h) computation of the second term on the right hand side of Eq. (22) and the terms on the right hand side of Eqs. (23) and (24) for each electrode.…”
Section: The Efgm Approach For Cem Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In data preparation stage, the following are determined (a) geometry and material physical properties of the subregions, (b) a nodal distribution for discretizing the full domain, (c) the domain of influence for each node, (d) the number and size of the integration cells, and the number of integration points inside each integration cell, (e) support domain for each integration point, (f) weights, shape functions, and shape function derivatives, for each node in the entire region, (g) nodes and integration points along electrodes, and (h) computation of the second term on the right hand side of Eq. (22) and the terms on the right hand side of Eqs. (23) and (24) for each electrode.…”
Section: The Efgm Approach For Cem Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A number of meshfree methods have been recently developed [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Since the meshfree methods require only nodal data and no element connectivity is needed, there are more flexible than the FEM in EIT problems with moving objects inside the imaging region [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial coordinate ξ is defined to be zero at the scaling center, unity value at the boundary, and infinity for far field. The conversion between the scaled boundary and Cartesian coordinate system can be written as follows [10][11][12][13][14] ) ( (29) with the Jacobian at the boundary being defined as…”
Section: Iefg-sbm Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of IMLS method still has great difficulty in numerical computation because the singularity involved in the weight function complicates the computation of the inverse of the singular matrix and thus increases the computational cost. To overcome this shortcoming, a perturbation technique was introduced by Netuzhylov [29] into the IMLS method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaljevic and Saigal presented an improved formulation of the EFG method based on the IMLS method [33]. Netuzhylov used the meshfree collocation method based on the IMLS method to solve boundary value problems [49]. Ren et al presented the interpolating boundary element-free (IBEF) method and interpolating element-free Galerkin (IEFG) method for two-dimensional potential and elasticity problems [57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%