1988
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.8.4.1614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enforced expression of the c-myc oncogene inhibits cell differentiation by precluding entry into a distinct predifferentiation state in G0/G1.

Abstract: A broad base of data has implicated a role for the c-myc proto-oncogene in the control of the cell cycle and cell differentiation. To further define the role of myc in these processes, I examined the effect of enforced myc expression on several events that are thought to be important steps leading to the terminally differentiated state:(i) the ability to arrest growth in GWG1, (ii) the ability to replicate the genome upon initiation of the differentiation program, and (iii) the ability to lose responsiveness t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
155
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
9
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) EMSA was performed with 32 P-labeled EY and competed with EY (lanes 2 ± 4), EDY (lanes 5 ± 7), DEY (lanes 8 ± 10) and DEDY (lanes 11 ± 13) (c) EMSA was performed with 32 P-labeled EDY and competed with EY (lanes 2 ± 4), EDY (lanes 5 ± 7), DEY (lanes 8 ± 10) and DEDY (lanes 11 ± 13). The nucleotide sequences of the oligonucleotides used in this experiment is described in Table 1 (Spotts and Hann, 1990;Lachman and Skoultchi, 1984) and many other cell lines (Maruyama et al, 1987;Freitag, 1988;Miner and Wold, 1991; and expression of glycophorin gene as well as globin genes was inhibited by overexpression of c-Myc during MEL cell di erentiation (Shoji et al, 1993). We demonstrated here a physical direct interaction of c-Myc with YY-1 in MEL cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…(b) EMSA was performed with 32 P-labeled EY and competed with EY (lanes 2 ± 4), EDY (lanes 5 ± 7), DEY (lanes 8 ± 10) and DEDY (lanes 11 ± 13) (c) EMSA was performed with 32 P-labeled EDY and competed with EY (lanes 2 ± 4), EDY (lanes 5 ± 7), DEY (lanes 8 ± 10) and DEDY (lanes 11 ± 13). The nucleotide sequences of the oligonucleotides used in this experiment is described in Table 1 (Spotts and Hann, 1990;Lachman and Skoultchi, 1984) and many other cell lines (Maruyama et al, 1987;Freitag, 1988;Miner and Wold, 1991; and expression of glycophorin gene as well as globin genes was inhibited by overexpression of c-Myc during MEL cell di erentiation (Shoji et al, 1993). We demonstrated here a physical direct interaction of c-Myc with YY-1 in MEL cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Over-expressed myc protein in dysplastic and tumour cells, accumulating in the cytoplasm and transferring continuously to the nucleus, may alter cellular response to growth factors and abrogate normal growth control mechanisms by preventing cells from escaping from the proliferation cycle (Freytag, 1988). C-myc protein may also control its own expression by binding, directly or indirectly, to the c-myc gene; if this interaction is affected by DNA methylation (see Prendergast & Ziff, 1991), there may be a feedback effect between hypomethylation of the third exon of myc and deregulation of expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation of c-myc is su cient to induce cell cycle entry in quiescent cells (Eilers et al, 1991). Moreover, constitutive expression of c-myc inhibits di erentiation and prevents cells from leaving the cell cycle (Coppola and Cole, 1986;Freytag, 1988). Conversely, inhibition of c-myc expression using an antisense approach leads to growth arrest and induction of di erentiation (Heikkila et al, 1987;Prochownik et al, 1988;Biro et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%