2007
DOI: 10.1163/156856707779160889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy transfer reaction of cationic porphyrin complexes on the clay surface: effect of sample preparation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by the ease with which the porphyrin 4-pyridyl group approaches the TiO 2 due to the interaction between incompletely coordinated titanium atoms on the surface of TiO 2 , and the lone electron pair of the nitrogen atom, favoring electron transfer from a photosensitizer to the TiO 2 surface. On the other hand, the steric effect of the methyl (−CH 3 ) group prevents the SnTMPyP from approaching the surface of TiO 2 or Pt, thus inhibiting the electron transfer. Additionally, it can be seen (see also Figure ) that the energy of the electron in the π-radical anion of SnTMPyP (estimated by the first reduction potential of the respective porphyrin) and its further reduction products is the lowest among the porphyrins studied and approaches the energy required for the proton reduction, which could make this porphyrin less efficient, if any overpotential is present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This can be explained by the ease with which the porphyrin 4-pyridyl group approaches the TiO 2 due to the interaction between incompletely coordinated titanium atoms on the surface of TiO 2 , and the lone electron pair of the nitrogen atom, favoring electron transfer from a photosensitizer to the TiO 2 surface. On the other hand, the steric effect of the methyl (−CH 3 ) group prevents the SnTMPyP from approaching the surface of TiO 2 or Pt, thus inhibiting the electron transfer. Additionally, it can be seen (see also Figure ) that the energy of the electron in the π-radical anion of SnTMPyP (estimated by the first reduction potential of the respective porphyrin) and its further reduction products is the lowest among the porphyrins studied and approaches the energy required for the proton reduction, which could make this porphyrin less efficient, if any overpotential is present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, according to the redox potential sequence they have a lower oxidizing strength in the excited state for reductive quenching with EDTA as discussed in section . , On the other hand, N -methyl-4-pyridyl is the most electron-withdrawing substituent with a longer lifetime of its π-radical anion and a higher tendency to form phlorin rather than chlorin. However, it cannot be adsorbed on the semiconductor due to the steric effect of the methyl group hindering its approach to the TiO 2 or to the catalyst surfaces. The 4-pyridyl group has desirable characteristics, namely, electron-withdrawing ability and no steric hindrance preventing it from approaching the TiO 2 surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concentration of the dyes, which are adsorbed on the surface of colloidal particles or are intercalated in solid matrix, is mostly sufficiently high. The close intermolecular distances between ED and EA molecules support an efficient FRET (Takagi et al, 2007). Multistep FRET has been observed in ternary or more complex systems based on clay minerals and three types of interacting dyes (Bujdák et al, 2011;Belušáková et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resonance Energy Transfer In Hybrid Materialsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The mixing was aimed at reducing the void size in the films which causes the reduced light scattering. 10) and Rockwood Additives, 11) respectively. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of these smectites were determined as 76 and 80 meq/100 g, respectively, by quantitative elemental analysis of sodium using inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%