1985
DOI: 10.1021/ic00207a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-transfer quenching of excited states of polypyridine complexes of ruthenium(II) by hexaamminecobalt(III) or tris(ethylenediamine)cobalt(III)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30,31 While neither Pt(II) nor Pt(IV) have been reported to induce such fluorescence changes, the results from other d 8 and d 6 ions are encouraging. [32][33][34][35][36] It was hypothesized that changes in fluorescence induced by ligand loss and/or changes in oxidation state could be utilised in microscopy studies to observe the temporal and physical location of these key events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,31 While neither Pt(II) nor Pt(IV) have been reported to induce such fluorescence changes, the results from other d 8 and d 6 ions are encouraging. [32][33][34][35][36] It was hypothesized that changes in fluorescence induced by ligand loss and/or changes in oxidation state could be utilised in microscopy studies to observe the temporal and physical location of these key events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum yield of Co(II) from the quenching of Ru(menbpy) 3 2+ by Co(acac) 3 is less than 1%. The quantum yield for Co(II) products, Φ Co(II) , is given by where the various rate constants are defined in Scheme . As shown by eq 6, the quantum yield is a complex expression that depends on the rate constants for both the electron- and energy-transfer quenching reactions as well as the rate of dissociation of the successor complex and the rate of ligand loss from the Co(II) product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%