1974
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(74)80046-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy transfer in classical collinear and perpendicular central collisions of a structureless atom with a morse oscillator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anisotropy of the molecule is determined by the equilibrium internuclear separation r e and the steepness parameter α through the two-body potential and is not an independently adjustable parameter. This model is very similar to that used by Faubel and Toennies . The two constants V 0 (2000 cm −1 ) and α (1.5 Å −1 ) were adjusted by hand to give the best overall agreement with the vibrationally inelastic experimental results.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experiments and Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The anisotropy of the molecule is determined by the equilibrium internuclear separation r e and the steepness parameter α through the two-body potential and is not an independently adjustable parameter. This model is very similar to that used by Faubel and Toennies . The two constants V 0 (2000 cm −1 ) and α (1.5 Å −1 ) were adjusted by hand to give the best overall agreement with the vibrationally inelastic experimental results.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experiments and Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is very similar to that used by Faubel and Toennies. 6 The two constants V 0 (2000 cm -1 ) and R (1.5 Å -1 ) were adjusted by hand to give the best overall agreement with the vibrationally inelastic experimental results.…”
Section: Origin Of the Structures In The Crossmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At collision energies which are not too low the spectator model has proved to be successful: the collision between the atom and the molecule takes place in such a way that the impinging atom 3 either interacts only with atom 1 or with atom 2, while the other (non-struck) atom remains completely undisturbed by this binary encounter (Gillen et a1 1973a, b, Schottler andToennies 1974). The binding of the molecule is taken into account only so far as it yields a momentum distribution for the relative motion of the two target atoms.…”
Section: P Eckelt and H J Korschmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the potential hypersurface of the system is unknown and an exact quantum-mechanical treatment of the collision process is not feasible in practice (particularly as a consequence of the continuum states, which arise in break-up collisions). Therefore, one is dependent on model potentials and on approximate ideas of the collision mechanism: collinear collision models in classical (Fan 1971), semi-classical (Johnson and Roberts 1970, Lin 1974), quantummechanical distorted-wave Born (Lin 1972) or impulse approximation (Eckelt and Korsch 1973); three-dimensional calculations in the framework of classical mechanics (Baudon 1973, Faubel and Toennies 1974, North et al 1974, semi-classical (Brown and Munn 1972), quantum-mechanical high energy (Garbarino and Wartell 1974) or statistical (Moran and Fullerton 1971, Rebick and Levine 1973) theories; see also the review by McClure and Peek (1972). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%