2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Transfer Assays Using Quantum Dot–Gold Nanoparticle Complexes: Optimizing Oligonucleotide Assay Configuration Using Monovalently Conjugated Quantum Dots

Abstract: The energy transfer between quantum dots (QDs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) represents a popular transduction scheme in analytical assays that use nanomaterials. The impact of the spatial arrangement of the two types of nanoparticles on analytical performance has now been evaluated using a nucleic acid strand displacement assay. The first spatial arrangement (configuration 1) involved the assembly of a number of monovalently functionalized QD-oligonucleotide conjugates around a single central AuNP that was f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated distance with 50% energy transfer, R 0 , was 14.4 nm for FRET, which was longer than that for general organic dye acceptors (typically R 0 < 10 nm), owing to the large extinction coefficient of AuNP (ε = 1.4 × 10 7 M –1 cm –1 at 520 nm). 24 With QD 514 -AuNP, the FRET model provided the best fit to our experimental data with the specifically calculated and estimated distances, which was different from our previous study using QDs and ultrasmall AuNPs (1.5 nm) and other literature reports. 15 , 23 Here, the calculated FRET model estimated higher efficiency than other models because the extinction coefficient of 5 nm AuNPs is 2–3 orders of magnitude higher than that of 1.5 nm AuNPs.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated distance with 50% energy transfer, R 0 , was 14.4 nm for FRET, which was longer than that for general organic dye acceptors (typically R 0 < 10 nm), owing to the large extinction coefficient of AuNP (ε = 1.4 × 10 7 M –1 cm –1 at 520 nm). 24 With QD 514 -AuNP, the FRET model provided the best fit to our experimental data with the specifically calculated and estimated distances, which was different from our previous study using QDs and ultrasmall AuNPs (1.5 nm) and other literature reports. 15 , 23 Here, the calculated FRET model estimated higher efficiency than other models because the extinction coefficient of 5 nm AuNPs is 2–3 orders of magnitude higher than that of 1.5 nm AuNPs.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, we could not completely exclude the inner-screening effect of AuNPs, the electron transfer, or the electrostatic interaction as additional contributions to quenching. 23 , 24 Regardless of the fit to the models, the observed PL quenching indicated the binding between the Spike subunit and ACE2, demonstrating that QD-Spike is a viable method for the production of pseudovirions that can be monitored in real time by their emission characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While QDs possess many favorable optical properties, surface energy transfer is a potential concern when designing a surface immobilized QD transduction system. [ 31 ] The emission spectra of our surface probe system, Au/MCH/Cy5‐DNA/BSA + (TetR‐QD) is shown in Figure 3a. The QD emission is similar compared to the emission from its aqueous solution counterpart (Figure 3b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Y-shaped structure of cocaine binding aptamer causes the AuNP comes to the nearness of the QD, resulting in the formation of a weak fluorescent signal because of well-known fluorescence quencher effect of AuNPs. [34][35][36] The correlation between fluorescence quenching and analyte concentration was used to obtain a calibration graph for the analysis of cocaine abuse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%