2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy system analysis for evaluation of sector coupling technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar analysis has been performed for the case of Italy, showing that the flexibility ensured by electric vehicles and battery storage reduces the need for VRES capacity expansion by 24-44% [25]. Technological overview, systems analysis and economic assessment of the power-to-gas technologies were analysed by Robinius et al [26] while energy system analysis for evaluation of sector coupling technologies was analysed by Boblenz et al [27]. Nevertheless, all these studies focused on specific sectoral interactions, failing to analyse and compare the individual contributions of each sector-coupling option to the system as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A similar analysis has been performed for the case of Italy, showing that the flexibility ensured by electric vehicles and battery storage reduces the need for VRES capacity expansion by 24-44% [25]. Technological overview, systems analysis and economic assessment of the power-to-gas technologies were analysed by Robinius et al [26] while energy system analysis for evaluation of sector coupling technologies was analysed by Boblenz et al [27]. Nevertheless, all these studies focused on specific sectoral interactions, failing to analyse and compare the individual contributions of each sector-coupling option to the system as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While in Zöphel et al (2018) [25], the quantification is more focused on the framework condition of the considered higher-level energy system. Another top-down quantification approach is used in Boblenz et al (2019) [26] where only the flexibility demand of the higher-level energy system is quantified. Additionally, studies by Perera et al ( 2019) and Yang et al (2023) [27,28] use different flexibility indicators to evaluate the design decisions of DCESs.…”
Section: Review Of Flexibility Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Power-to-Heat  Power-to-X (Chemicals)  Vehicle-to Grid With such models, more sustainable exploitation of renewables ensured by connecting different end-users to different renewable energy sources. Energy storage systems are major technologies that regulate fluctuations of energy supply (Boblenz et al, 2019). This method can provide more efficient and flexible energy systems.…”
Section: Sector Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can provide more efficient and flexible energy systems. Also, the cost of decarbonisation can be reduced (Boblenz et al, 2019;Nuffel, 2018). Sensible TES systems are 50 -100 times cheaper than electrical storage systems.…”
Section: Sector Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%