2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy storage sizing in plug-in Electric Vehicles: Driving cycle uncertainty effect analysis and machine learning based sizing framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the validation methods, 25 of the selected studies use them to assess the prediction accuracy of ECEV models. As can be seen in Figure 10, the cross-validation method is the most frequently used in 15 studies [36,[47][48][49]64,71,102,106,109,111,115,120,121,160,164], followed by 10-fold cross-validation in 10 studies [41,43,51,52,83,103,141,147,165,170], 5-fold cross-validation in 6 studies [91,94,108,152,158,167], then 3-fold cross-validation in 3 studies [92,93,152]. Less studied cross-validations methods are not shown in Figure 10, such as 1-2-4-fold cross validation [152], 6-fold cross validation [137], 8-fold cross validation [146], 9-fold cross-validation [122], and leave-one-out cross-validation [83] which are in only 1 study each.…”
Section: Evaluation Measures and Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning the validation methods, 25 of the selected studies use them to assess the prediction accuracy of ECEV models. As can be seen in Figure 10, the cross-validation method is the most frequently used in 15 studies [36,[47][48][49]64,71,102,106,109,111,115,120,121,160,164], followed by 10-fold cross-validation in 10 studies [41,43,51,52,83,103,141,147,165,170], 5-fold cross-validation in 6 studies [91,94,108,152,158,167], then 3-fold cross-validation in 3 studies [92,93,152]. Less studied cross-validations methods are not shown in Figure 10, such as 1-2-4-fold cross validation [152], 6-fold cross validation [137], 8-fold cross validation [146], 9-fold cross-validation [122], and leave-one-out cross-validation [83] which are in only 1 study each.…”
Section: Evaluation Measures and Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References N • of Studies ML-based EMS [23][24][25]27,[29][30][31]33,[35][36][37]39,40,42,45,49,53,55,58,60,61,[65][66][67]69,70,73,74,77,88,90,91,98,100,104,105,113,126,129,132,133,135,136,139,141,146,149,156,166,174] 50 ML-based speed profile prediction [19]…”
Section: Resolution Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of electric vehicles, driving cycles play a fundamental role in determining energy consumption and, ultimately, vehicle autonomy. In this particular research, we used three common cycles to explore energy consumption: the new European driving cycle (NEDC), worldwide harmonized light vehicle test cycle type 2 (WLTC-2), and type 3 (WLTC-3) [27][28][29].…”
Section: Driving Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective was to gather a diverse range of information from these papers, encompassing 9 distinct features. By incorporating these features, our aim was to develop ML models capable of predicting SC behavior across a broad spectrum of conditions [31,32]. The inclusion of all relevant input characteristics is a pivotal phase in the construction of ML models, enabling the models to capture the essential aspects of the experimental research while accounting for the significant factors impacting SC performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%