43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-5797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Steepened States of the Taylor-Culick Profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the incompressible motion is relatively well understood (Taylor 1956;Culick 1966;Majdalani & Akiki 2010), recent advances have enabled us to account for the presence of arbitrary headwall injection (Majdalani & Saad 2007b;Saad & Majdalani 2009), wall regression (Majdalani, Vyas & Flandro 2002;Zhou & Majdalani 2002), grain taper (Saad, Sams & Majdalani 2006;Sams, Majdalani & Saad 2007), variable cross-section (Kurdyumov 2006), headwall singularity (Chedevergne, Casalis & Féraille 2006), viscous effects (Majdalani & Akiki 2010), and stability (Chedevergne, Casalis & Majdalani 2012). Furthermore, flow approximations exhibiting smoother or steeper profiles than the cold flow equilibrium state have been studied in connection with their energy content by Majdalani & Saad (2007a) and Saad & Majdalani (2008). In what concerns compressible flow effects, these have been first investigated by Traineau, Hervat & Kuentzmann (1986) in the context of two-dimensional porous tubes and channels with sidewall injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the incompressible motion is relatively well understood (Taylor 1956;Culick 1966;Majdalani & Akiki 2010), recent advances have enabled us to account for the presence of arbitrary headwall injection (Majdalani & Saad 2007b;Saad & Majdalani 2009), wall regression (Majdalani, Vyas & Flandro 2002;Zhou & Majdalani 2002), grain taper (Saad, Sams & Majdalani 2006;Sams, Majdalani & Saad 2007), variable cross-section (Kurdyumov 2006), headwall singularity (Chedevergne, Casalis & Féraille 2006), viscous effects (Majdalani & Akiki 2010), and stability (Chedevergne, Casalis & Majdalani 2012). Furthermore, flow approximations exhibiting smoother or steeper profiles than the cold flow equilibrium state have been studied in connection with their energy content by Majdalani & Saad (2007a) and Saad & Majdalani (2008). In what concerns compressible flow effects, these have been first investigated by Traineau, Hervat & Kuentzmann (1986) in the context of two-dimensional porous tubes and channels with sidewall injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pursuant to the original discussion by Majdalani & Saad (2007a), it may be hypothesized that two complementary families of solutions exist with the unique characteristics of exhibiting continually varying energy levels from which the Taylor-Culick model may be recovered. To this end, it may be useful to seek mean-flow solutions with either increasing or decreasing energies.…”
Section: Generalization (A) Type I Solutions With Increasing Energy Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process, we unravel a family of approximate solutions that satisfy the problem's fundamental constraints (see also Majdalani & Saad 2007a). Among those, we apply the Lagrangian optimization principle to identify the particular forms that require the most or the least kinetic energy to appear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While β n was prescribed by the headwall injection pattern, the choice of α n appeared to be flexible provided that the constraint given by (22) remained satisfied. In this section, we follow Majdalani & Saad (2007a) by applying the Lagrangian optimization technique to the total kinetic energy of the generalized Taylor-Culick solution to the extent of producing a variational constraint on α n (see also Saad & Majdalani, 2010). After some effort, two types of solutions will be identified with increasing or decreasing kinetic energies; of the two families, the Taylor-Culick model will be recovered as a special case.…”
Section: Generalized Taylor-culick Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will be the topic of Section 2 where the solutions for the Taylor-Culick flow with arbitrary headwall injection are derived and compared to steady state, second order accurate inviscid computations. In subsequent work, Majdalani & Saad (2007a) and Saad & Majdalani (2010) manage to introduce a variational procedure based on Lagrangian multipliers to identify solutions of the Taylor-Culick type with varying kinetic energies. As it will be seen in Section 3, these will help to uncover a wide array of motions ranging from purely irrotational to highly rotational fields.…”
Section: Generalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%