2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12983-016-0180-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy state affects exploratory behavior of tree sparrows in a group context under differential food-patch distributions

Abstract: BackgroundWhen facing a novel situation, animals can retreat or leave to avoid risks, but will miss potential resources and opportunities. Alternatively they may reduce environmental uncertainty by exploration, while risking no energy rewards and exposure to hazards, and use the information retrieved for subsequent decision making. When exploring, however, animals may adopt different tactics according to individual states.ResultsWe tested that energy states will affect exploratory behavior by experimenting wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in line with previous studies performed in fish where familiarity was associated with increased time spent exploring a novel object, latency to emerge from a refuge and faster habituation to a novel environment [ 30 , 73 , 74 ]. The latency to visit the ground is particularly important, as birds usually perceive the soil as a higher-risk area compared to perches that were higher off the ground [ 20 , 60 ], and in our set-up the birds rarely visited the ground for reasons different than going to a water source [BT unpublished observation]. For these reasons we argue that a shorter latency to venture on the ground provides a strong indication of reduced perceived predation risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is in line with previous studies performed in fish where familiarity was associated with increased time spent exploring a novel object, latency to emerge from a refuge and faster habituation to a novel environment [ 30 , 73 , 74 ]. The latency to visit the ground is particularly important, as birds usually perceive the soil as a higher-risk area compared to perches that were higher off the ground [ 20 , 60 ], and in our set-up the birds rarely visited the ground for reasons different than going to a water source [BT unpublished observation]. For these reasons we argue that a shorter latency to venture on the ground provides a strong indication of reduced perceived predation risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two hours prior to each test the food bowl was removed from the temporary aviaries of the individual(s) scheduled for the test, in order to normalize the foraging motivation [ 60 ]. After the birds undergoing testing were capture and removed from the temporary housing aviary, food was returned to the other individuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the three contexts, the TB context was most confined in space of the three settings, but nevertheless resembled the real-life situation in which the bats climb along rugged wall surfaces while inside their roost in a karst reef cave. The HB setting was less confined than the TB setting, and the center arena of the box served as a novel open area that potentially exposed the bats to a riskier situation [72]. In comparison, the FT context represented an even more open space than the TB or HB setting to the bats; however, it also Flying significantly increases the ability of bats to avoid and evade potential risks [73]; thus, being able to fly can reduce their vulnerability as a result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if behavior trait stabilities are heritable, they could explain why D. melanogaster strains derived from the same wild population display dramatic differences in their behavior responses to new odor environments [53][54][55] . They may also help us understand how and why starved animals show different degrees of search and exploratory behavior compared to non-starved animals [56][57][58] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%