2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3129930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Shortage Failure Prediction in Photovoltaic Standalone Installations by Using Machine Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of representative papers in the literature [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] show that the NARX neural network notably outperformed the other persistence models, and it is better than linear regression models. Accordingly, comparative test results analysis with other predicting methods in terms of similar statistical error measurements (i.e., mean bias error, mean absolute error, mean square error, root mean square error, normalized root mean squared error, and/or mean absolute percentage error) confirms NARX-based model prediction performances when it is used for renewable energy forecasting, as follows: (1) wind speed prediction [48,50,55,56], (2) solar irradiance prediction [45,51], (3) energy storage systems in photovoltaic installations [52], (4) output power prediction of the PV panels [53], electric power prediction [1], and (5) electrical load forecasting for buildings [47,48,57,58]. All these indicate that the NARX-based model has been implemented since the last decade for energy prediction issues and particularly it was widely adopted for forecasting the PV power output in relevant literature [41][42][43]47,49,53,57,58].…”
Section: Narx-based Model For Pv Power Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of representative papers in the literature [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] show that the NARX neural network notably outperformed the other persistence models, and it is better than linear regression models. Accordingly, comparative test results analysis with other predicting methods in terms of similar statistical error measurements (i.e., mean bias error, mean absolute error, mean square error, root mean square error, normalized root mean squared error, and/or mean absolute percentage error) confirms NARX-based model prediction performances when it is used for renewable energy forecasting, as follows: (1) wind speed prediction [48,50,55,56], (2) solar irradiance prediction [45,51], (3) energy storage systems in photovoltaic installations [52], (4) output power prediction of the PV panels [53], electric power prediction [1], and (5) electrical load forecasting for buildings [47,48,57,58]. All these indicate that the NARX-based model has been implemented since the last decade for energy prediction issues and particularly it was widely adopted for forecasting the PV power output in relevant literature [41][42][43]47,49,53,57,58].…”
Section: Narx-based Model For Pv Power Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their installation costs are relatively high. In contrast, the standalone solar power system market has witnessed a significant growth in recent years [6,7]. Several factors can be attributed to this growth: Firstly, the efforts of governments across the globe to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate employed for the inverter to improve power harmonic content and reduce the size of the low-pass filter (LPF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%