1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.83.4658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Resolved Positron Annihilation in Flight in Solid Targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data constitute the first observation of Doppler broadening due to these deep core electrons in a high Z material. In-flight two-photon annihilation with gold M-shell electrons has been detected for 70 keV positrons by recording the energy of both annihilation g rays, E T E 1 1 E 2 [18]. Since energy is conserved the binding energy of the M-shell electrons shifted the centroid in this sum energy spectrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data constitute the first observation of Doppler broadening due to these deep core electrons in a high Z material. In-flight two-photon annihilation with gold M-shell electrons has been detected for 70 keV positrons by recording the energy of both annihilation g rays, E T E 1 1 E 2 [18]. Since energy is conserved the binding energy of the M-shell electrons shifted the centroid in this sum energy spectrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also evident that there is no linear Zeeman shift, since x does not appear linearly (Eqs. (27) and (28)). The dependence of the perturbed energy levels on the magnetic field are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Ps In Electric and Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realizing the limitations of this method, a more accurate technique was developed [23][24][25] which remains the standard method for precision hyperfine interval measurements. Deutsch later went on to perform positron annihilation in flight measurements [26] which also became antecedents of modern day measurements (e.g., [27,28]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore size cannot be determined. Two variations of DBS involve using two germanium detectors simultaneously (coincidence-DBS) (19) or measuring the S-parameter as a function of annihilation time [age-momentum correlation (AMOC)] (20). The coincidence-DBS technique offers significantly better energy resolution, is capable of distinguishing chemical environments, and may be useful in probing the pore surface chemistry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%