1985
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90060-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy release rate calculations by the finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…deLorenzi [26,27] improved the method by considering the strain energy release rate of a continuum. The main advantages of the continuum approach are…”
Section: Virtual Crack Closure Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…deLorenzi [26,27] improved the method by considering the strain energy release rate of a continuum. The main advantages of the continuum approach are…”
Section: Virtual Crack Closure Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The computation of J(s) has been performed using an equivalent domain integral, as proposed by Li et al (1985) and Shih et al (1986) (deLorenzi, 1982, 1985, obtained exactly the same result using the concept of virtual crack extension and a consistent continuum mechanics approach):…”
Section: Computation Of the J-integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1988, Lin and Abel [9] introduced a direct-integration approach for a virtual crack extension technique that employs the variational formulation and a ®nite element method (FEM) to calculate the ®rst derivative of SIF for a structure containing a single crack. This method maintains all of the advantages of similar virtual crack extension techniques introduced by deLorenzi [10,11], Haber and Koh [12], and Barbero and Reddy [13], but adds a capability to calculate the derivatives of the SIF. Subsequently, Hwang et al [14] generalized this method to calculate both ®rst-and secondorder derivatives for structures involving multiple crack systems, axisymmetric stress state, and crack-face and thermal loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%