2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1208.3678
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy reconstruction in quasielastic scattering in the MiniBooNE and T2K experiments

O. Lalakulich,
U. Mosel,
K. Gallmeister
Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As was discussed in Refs. [48,49,82,83], the influence of the multinucleon channel also manifests in the problem of the neutrino energy reconstruction [48,49,[82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was discussed in Refs. [48,49,82,83], the influence of the multinucleon channel also manifests in the problem of the neutrino energy reconstruction [48,49,[82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional charged-current quasielastic neutrino scattering, CCQE, the neutrino is converted to a charged lepton via exchange of a W boson with a nucleon, resulting in the following reaction: ν l n → l − p. (Antineutrino scattering reverses the lepton number and isospin: νl p → l + n.) Because the MINERvA detector is not magnetized, in this analysis we cannot differentiate between electrons and positrons on an event-by-event basis. Moreover, hadrons exiting the nucleus after the interaction can re-interact and change identity or eject other hadrons [7]; furthermore, interactions between nucleons within the initial state may cause multiple nucleons to be ejected by a single interaction or deform the observed kinematics [8,9]. Therefore, we choose a signal definition for this analysis that is more closely related to what is observable in the experiment: we search for events with either an electron or positron, no other leptons or photons, any number of nucleons, and no other hadrons, irrespective of the "true" original process.…”
Section: Signal Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The understanding of charged-current single-pion channels is of great interest to the nuclear community, but also, there are significant implications for the neutrino oscillation studies. These interactions produce an irreducible background for CCQE events [38][39][40][41]. If the detector fails to tag outgoing pions, either because of detector effects or nuclear effects, pion production channels may be misclassified as CCQE.…”
Section: Charged Single Pion Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%