2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy production through organic fraction of municipal solid waste—A multiple regression modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the quality of the prediction model it is necessary to take into account some general guidelines: i) moderation or simplicity; ii) identifiability; iii) goodness of fit; iv) theoretical consistency; and v) predictive power. The specification error was assessed assuming that one or more of the following mistakes were not committed: i) omit a relevant variable; ii) include an unnecessary variable; iii) adopt a wrong functional form; iv) incorrect specification of the stochastic disturbance term; and v) measurement errors [RAMESH et al 2015]. The consequences of including irrelevant variables in a model are, fortunately, not serious.…”
Section: Regression Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation

Journal of Water and Land Development

Guardia-Puebla,
Llanes-Cedeño,
Domínguez-León
et al. 2021
“…To determine the quality of the prediction model it is necessary to take into account some general guidelines: i) moderation or simplicity; ii) identifiability; iii) goodness of fit; iv) theoretical consistency; and v) predictive power. The specification error was assessed assuming that one or more of the following mistakes were not committed: i) omit a relevant variable; ii) include an unnecessary variable; iii) adopt a wrong functional form; iv) incorrect specification of the stochastic disturbance term; and v) measurement errors [RAMESH et al 2015]. The consequences of including irrelevant variables in a model are, fortunately, not serious.…”
Section: Regression Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to develop the best model, taking into account the highest estimation performance, eight model equations including different input parameter combinations were analysed. RAMESH et al [2015] developed a multiple linear model in which COD removal was the dependent variable, and different parameters, such as HRT, OLR, sludge loading rate, influent pH, effluent pH, inlet and outlet VFA concentration, inlet and outlet volatile suspended solids and total solids (VSS/TS) ratio, and influent and effluent COD, were considered as independent variables. The results of the step-wise regression method applied revealed that only four parameters (influent COD, effluent COD, volatile solids and total solids (VS/TS) ratio and influent pH) were significant on COD removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%

Journal of Water and Land Development

Guardia-Puebla,
Llanes-Cedeño,
Domínguez-León
et al. 2021
“…According to the results, all variables satisfy the Kolmogorow-Smirnov test as well the Shapiro-Wilk Test of normality (p>.05). Therefore, it is allowed to perform the parametric test correlation of Pearson without transforming any variable (Ramesh et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Assumption Of Normalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven models use artificial intelligence; for example, back propagation (BP) neural networks apply self-learning to existing data to deduct an optimal model (Yu et al, 2013). Factor models are based on factors that help in the prediction of waste generation, but also allow researchers to quantify factors' contribution to the model (Ramesh et al, 2015). Conventional waste prediction models often include correlation analysis and consider various independent variables (Kolekar et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%