The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.54.1372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-pooling collisions in cesium: 6PJ+6PJ

Abstract: We report experimental rate coefficients for the energy-pooling collisions Cs(6 P 1/2 ) ϩCs(6 P 1/2 )→Cs(6S 1/2 )ϩCs(nl J Ј ) and Cs(6 P 3/2 )ϩCs(6 P 3/2 )→Cs(6S 1/2 )ϩCs(nl J Ј ) where nl J Ј ϭ7P 1/2 , 7 P 3/2 , 6D 3/2 , 6D 5/2 , 8S 1/2 , 4F 5/2 , or 4F 7/2 . Atoms were excited to either the 6 P 1/2 or 6 P 3/2 state using a single-mode Ti:sapphire laser. The excited-atom density and spatial distribution were mapped by monitoring the absorption of a counterpropagating single-mode ring dye laser beam, tuned to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From line-center absorption measurements of the cesium D, line hyperfine components, we were able to verify the Nesmeyanov formula at room temperature to within 4.5%, corresponding to a temperature discrepancy of 0.5"C. 24 Since this is equal to the temperature uncertainty, we believe the Nesmeyanov formula is fairly accurate in this low-temperature range. However, as stated above, the extrapolation of this temperature-density relation to the higher temperatures of the present experiment introduces additional uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…From line-center absorption measurements of the cesium D, line hyperfine components, we were able to verify the Nesmeyanov formula at room temperature to within 4.5%, corresponding to a temperature discrepancy of 0.5"C. 24 Since this is equal to the temperature uncertainty, we believe the Nesmeyanov formula is fairly accurate in this low-temperature range. However, as stated above, the extrapolation of this temperature-density relation to the higher temperatures of the present experiment introduces additional uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This reaction is a good candidate for the modeling and measurement of the retrofluorescence signal because the reaction has been extensively studied by de Tomasi et al 5 and by Jabbour et al 7 and because the spectral lines at 455.5 and 459.3 nm are easily experimentally observed, as we shall see in Section 4. In formulating our model, we must consider the hyperfine structure of the absorbing Cs transition ͓6 2 S 1/2 → 6 2 P 3/2 ͔. Focusing our attention on reaction (3) allows us to eliminate a number of transitions and levels in Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Retrofluorescence Signal Related To The Enermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The work of Jabbour et al [6] indicates that, in Cs vapour resonantly excited at 6 2 P 3/2 , 6 2 D the excited state is predominantly produced during the energy-pooling process (the cross section is at least 10 times larger than the other processes). The reaction 6 2 P + 6 2 P → 6 2 D + 6 2 S in a Cs vapour has been extensively investigated both theoretically and experimentally [4][5][6][7]. The investigation of the 6 2 P 3/2 and 7 2 P 1/2,3/2 levels by retrofluorescence spectroscopy was considered in previous papers [1,2].…”
Section: Description Of the Geometry And The Physical Processes At Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the selective excitation of one level of the atomic 6 2 P term, the energy-pooling reaction is of the following form: Cs 6 2 P J + Cs 6 2 P J → Cs (nl J ) + Cs 6 2 S 1/2 , where nl J is a highly excited level. The 2Cs 6 2 P 3/2 energy-pooling collisions have been studied extensively both theoretically and experimentally [4][5][6][7][8]: the more efficient reaction is the one that produces the 6 2 D excited state [6]. To our knowledge, no theoretical or experimental spectroscopic works have yet been published describing a thorough study of the population of the 6 2 P 1/2 level at the interface between a dissipative surface and an optically thick Cs vapour, in a regime of selective pumping of 6 2 P 3/2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%