2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy of Oxygen-Vacancy Formation on Oxide Surfaces: Role of the Spatial Distribution

Abstract: Oxygen vacancy formation energies are often used as a descriptor of the catalytic activity of metal oxides for oxidation reactions having the Mars-van Krevelen mechanism. When these energies are calculated, it is often assumed that they depend only on the concentration of the vacancies in the top oxygen layer. Previous work has shown that in the case of TiO2 and V2O5, the energy of vacancy formation depends not only on their concentration but also on the manner in which they are distributed on the surface. How… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are summarized in Table . It has been accepted that the energy for oxygen vacancy formation is a good descriptor of the oxidizing power of an oxide: a lower energy for vacancy formation indicates a better oxidant. , The vacancy formation energies of the Ru-based oxide materials were strongly dependent on the structure and type of constituent oxygen atoms and increased in the order of the face-sharing O A atom in BaRuO 3 (3.43 eV) < SrRuO 3 (3.59/3.66 eV) < CaRuO 3 (3.69/3.71 eV) < RuO 2 (4.03 eV) < the corner-sharing O B atom in BaRuO 3 (4.04 eV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are summarized in Table . It has been accepted that the energy for oxygen vacancy formation is a good descriptor of the oxidizing power of an oxide: a lower energy for vacancy formation indicates a better oxidant. , The vacancy formation energies of the Ru-based oxide materials were strongly dependent on the structure and type of constituent oxygen atoms and increased in the order of the face-sharing O A atom in BaRuO 3 (3.43 eV) < SrRuO 3 (3.59/3.66 eV) < CaRuO 3 (3.69/3.71 eV) < RuO 2 (4.03 eV) < the corner-sharing O B atom in BaRuO 3 (4.04 eV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been accepted that the energy for oxygen vacancy formation is a good descriptor of the oxidizing power of an oxide: a lower energy for vacancy formation indicates a better oxidant. 71,72 The vacancy formation energies of the Rubased oxide materials were strongly dependent on the structure Figure 9b shows XPS O 1s spectra for the Ru-based oxides. The broad peaks can be deconvoluted into three distinct peaks around 529.0, 530.5, and 532.2 eV, which are attributed to lattice oxygen, adsorbed oxygen species, and adsorbed molecular water, respectively (Table S3).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change in the ORR activity from the Zn substitution value of 0.1 to 0.3 is a consequence of the interplay between the hole and ionic distribution in the B site ,. The generated oxygen vacancies subsequent to the displacement of the Fe 3+ ions with the Zn 2+ ions in the tetrahedral site can concomitantly affect the adsorption and desorption energy of the molecular oxygen . This type of activity enhancement caused by oxygen vacancies can be explained by Marsvan Kervelen mechanism .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generated oxygen vacancies subsequent to the displacement of the Fe 3+ ions with the Zn 2+ ions in the tetrahedral site can concomitantly affect the adsorption and desorption energy of the molecular oxygen . This type of activity enhancement caused by oxygen vacancies can be explained by Marsvan Kervelen mechanism . As the mechanism says, the oxygen vacancies created in the crystal structure provides the active site for adsorption of molecular oxygen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous computational work [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73] on MoO3 was performed for the (010) surface. This is the cleavage plane and therefore is expected to have the lowest surface energy and be predominantly present in MoO3 crystallites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%