2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy norm based a posteriori error estimation for boundary element methods in two dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the constant depends only on Γ , see also [18], Lemma 2.1. The combination of the last three estimates thus yields η μ and concludes the proof.…”
Section: Lemma 38mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where the constant depends only on Γ , see also [18], Lemma 2.1. The combination of the last three estimates thus yields η μ and concludes the proof.…”
Section: Lemma 38mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], localized variants of η were introduced. In [18,19] the equivalence of η to hierarchical two-level error estimators from [24,28] and averaging error estimators from [9][10][11] has been analyzed.…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the H 1/2 -norm is non-local, the a posteriori error analysis requires appropriate localization techniques. These have recently been developed in the context of adaptive boundary element methods [2,10,11,15,16,20]: Under certain orthogonality properties of g − g ℓ ∈ H 1 (Γ D ), the natural trace norm g − g ℓ H 1/2 (Γ D ) is bounded by a locally weighted H 1 -seminorm…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on certain localization techniques, the works [8,9,15,16,21], for instance, give suitable error estimators μ 2 = E∈E μ (E) 2 which satisfy η μ , but whose contributions μ (E), at least heuristically, measure the local error. Moreover, based on recent results from [5], a compound error estimator ρ which additionally controls data oscillations, is used for all problem settings discussed in this paper.…”
Section: (H − H/2)-type Error Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%