2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.69.123508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-momentum tensor of cosmological fluctuations during inflation

Abstract: We study the renormalized energy-momentum tensor (EMT) of cosmological scalar fluctuations during the slow-rollover regime for chaotic inflation with a quadratic potential and find that it is characterized by a negative energy density which grows during slow-rollover. We also approach the back-reaction problem as a second-order calculation in perturbation theory finding no evidence that the back-reaction of cosmological fluctuations is a gauge artifact. In agreement with the results for the EMT, the average ex… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
96
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(85 reference statements)
5
96
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a context we cannot covariantly define the spatial boundaries as done for the temporal ones, for lack of appropriate fields at our disposal. Using for B(x) a function of the coordinates, which does not change under a GT, the integral (2.10) fails to be gauge invariant: repeating the same procedure as before we find that the final result (2.12), is replaced in this case by: 14) where 15) We see that the breaking of gauge invariance is given by an integral over a ring-shaped region lying near the space boundary, B = r 0 , and having a "thickness" ∆r controlled by the magnitude of the GT. We shall now argue that this breaking term tends to be subdominant for large enough spatial volumes.…”
Section: Jcap03(2009)011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a context we cannot covariantly define the spatial boundaries as done for the temporal ones, for lack of appropriate fields at our disposal. Using for B(x) a function of the coordinates, which does not change under a GT, the integral (2.10) fails to be gauge invariant: repeating the same procedure as before we find that the final result (2.12), is replaced in this case by: 14) where 15) We see that the breaking of gauge invariance is given by an integral over a ring-shaped region lying near the space boundary, B = r 0 , and having a "thickness" ∆r controlled by the magnitude of the GT. We shall now argue that this breaking term tends to be subdominant for large enough spatial volumes.…”
Section: Jcap03(2009)011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where δ(t − t 0 (r) − τ c ) is the delta function, τ c is the constant value of proper time which labels the hypersurface, and on the second line we have plugged in (5) and (11). To keep the analogy with the FRW case as close as possible, we will consider only spacetimes where the coordinate r ranges from 0 to ∞.…”
Section: Taking the Averagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, naive perturbative results break down when perturbations have an effect on the background, in other words when backreaction is important. In addition to the usual issues of cosmological perturbation theory such as gauge-invariance [8,11,22], one has to worry about new problems such as convergence and consistency of the perturbative expansion. These make consistent backreaction calculations in the perturbative framework an involved task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations