2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2564-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Loss of Swift Protons in Liquid Water: Role of Optical Data Input and Extension Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we use a similar expression to eq 2, but replacing the Drude dielectric functions by Mermin dielectric functions. 38 The values of the parameters A i , ω i , and γ i are, in principle, the same as those that appear in Table 1, since in the optical limit (i.e., at zero momentum transfer) the Drude and the Mermin ELF are identical; 33 however, in what follows, these parameters will be modified in order to improve the ELF.…”
Section: Improving the Elf Through The Melf-gosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we use a similar expression to eq 2, but replacing the Drude dielectric functions by Mermin dielectric functions. 38 The values of the parameters A i , ω i , and γ i are, in principle, the same as those that appear in Table 1, since in the optical limit (i.e., at zero momentum transfer) the Drude and the Mermin ELF are identical; 33 however, in what follows, these parameters will be modified in order to improve the ELF.…”
Section: Improving the Elf Through The Melf-gosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we present theoretical calculations of the IMFP and the stopping power (SP) of swift electrons in several targets of biological relevance, such as liquid water, DNA, protein, lipid, or sugar, using the extended‐optical‐data methodology to describe the dielectric function of the material. Specifically, the electronic excitation spectrum of each biomaterial is properly described by the MELF–GOS (Mermin Energy Loss Function – Generalized Oscillator Strength) model . The advantages of this methodology lie in that the MELF–GOS model incorporates damping corrections because of a plasmon's finite lifetime, an automatic extension to arbitrary momentum transfer (without introducing any especially designed extension algorithms), and takes into account many‐body, chemical and phase effects of the target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show in Figure 5 the electronic mean free path Drude-GOS ELF do not agree so well [20]. The influence of the exchange factor is only visible at very low electron en-47 ergies ( 10 eV).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This result is in good agreement with the fact 67 that single-particle excitations prevail over collective ex-68 citation as the momentum transfer increases due to the 69 plasmon damping. The dispersion of the damping coef-70 ficient, only considered (implicitly) in the MELF model, 71 provides the expected momentum broadening of the Bethe 72 ridge; the results from the MELF model agree better than 73 those from the extended-Drude model with the few ex-74 perimental data at k = 0 measured for graphite [28,29], 75 aluminum [30,31] or liquid water [20,32,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%