Energy loss of carbon ions in titanium, nickel, and germanium

Ved'manov, G. D.; Gavrilov, F. F.; Mizgulin, V. N.; Neshov, F. G.; Puzanov, A. A.; Urmanov, A. R.

doi:10.1007/bf00891570

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, conflicting data sets are seen for C-Ti. Here the reciprocity principle suggests that the difference is primarily due to the Ve79 data [14]. Figure 2 shows two typical graphs generated by the new version of REST [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reciprocity analysis of electronic stopping of slow ions

Sigmund

Kuzmin

Schinner

2019

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reciprocity denotes the (approximate) equality of the electronic stopping cross section of element A in element B with the one of element B in element A. Reciprocity is expected in the energy range below ∼ 0.1 MeV/u. For ions heavier than protons, most measurements are performed by the transmission technique. In order to minimize nuclear energy loss, only a narrow beam of penetrating ions is allowed to enter the detector. This implies that also the electronic energy loss is underestimated. We have estimated the magnitude of the necessary correction on the basis of the PASS code and its influence on the expected reciprocity and find that reciprocity is not necessarily violated, even if the reported cross sections differ significantly. However, we also find differences between reported stopping cross sections and computed reduced stopping cross sections that we cannot reconcile on the basis of the PASS code. These differences are found to reflect the well-known Z 1 structure, which is not inherent in the present version of PASS.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%