2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2019.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-loss correction in charge sharing events for improved performance of pixellated compound semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This levelling-off is observed in the measured FWHM and σ c values for the multi-pixel events in both detectors (Figure 7). A similar trend with energy has been observed by Bugby et al [36] in calculations of a charge loss correction parameter. Average interaction depth for photons of different energy in a 1 mm and 2 mm block of CdTe and CdZnTe, respectively.…”
Section: Depth Of Interaction and Charge Loss Correlationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This levelling-off is observed in the measured FWHM and σ c values for the multi-pixel events in both detectors (Figure 7). A similar trend with energy has been observed by Bugby et al [36] in calculations of a charge loss correction parameter. Average interaction depth for photons of different energy in a 1 mm and 2 mm block of CdTe and CdZnTe, respectively.…”
Section: Depth Of Interaction and Charge Loss Correlationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The charge loss is a result of a lower field region between pixels that results in additional charge trapping. This phenomenon has been studied previously in HEXITEC devices and is beyond the scope of this paper [ 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The average size of the charge cluster created by an x-ray interaction in a CdTe crystal was reported to be on the order of ~10 μm [14], thus the less separation between the neighboring pixels, the higher the probability of the charge sharing effect. To address this issue, HEXITEC offers two correction algorithms for the charge sharing effect: charge sharing discrimination (CSD) and charge sharing addition (CSA) [17,18]. Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Charge Sharing On the Acquired Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%