2013
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/87/04/045304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy levels, radiative rates and electron impact excitation rates for transitions in He-like Ga XXX, Ge XXXI, As XXXII, Se XXXIII and Br XXXIV

Abstract: We report calculations of energy levels, radiative rates and electron impact excitation cross sections and rates for transitions in He-like Ga XXX, Ge XXXI, As XXXII, Se XXXIII and Br XXXIV. The grasp (general-purpose relativistic atomic structure package) is adopted for calculating energy levels and radiative rates. For determining the collision strengths, and subsequently the excitation rates, the Dirac Atomic Rmatrix Code (darc) is used. Oscillator strengths, radiative rates and line strengths are reported … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe the discrepancies have arisen mainly due to some compromises made by Fernández-Menchero et al ( 2014) in calculating Ω and subsequently Υ, as noted in section 2. Similar large discrepancies between the two independent R-matrix approaches have also been noted in the past -see for example, Aggarwal & Keenan (2014b) for Fe XIV, Aggarwal & Keenan (2013b) and references therein for He-like and Aggarwal & Keenan (2012a) for Li-like ions. Therefore, it appears that the implementation of the ICFT approach, although computationally highly efficient (hence allowing data for many ions to be produced over relatively short periods), may not be completely robust.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…We believe the discrepancies have arisen mainly due to some compromises made by Fernández-Menchero et al ( 2014) in calculating Ω and subsequently Υ, as noted in section 2. Similar large discrepancies between the two independent R-matrix approaches have also been noted in the past -see for example, Aggarwal & Keenan (2014b) for Fe XIV, Aggarwal & Keenan (2013b) and references therein for He-like and Aggarwal & Keenan (2012a) for Li-like ions. Therefore, it appears that the implementation of the ICFT approach, although computationally highly efficient (hence allowing data for many ions to be produced over relatively short periods), may not be completely robust.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Several large-scale efforts to calculate excitation data for iso-electronic sequences have been undertaken. For He-like ions data is now available covering most ions from Mg 10+ to Kr 34+ (Aggarwal & Keenan 2012b, Aggarwal & Keenan 2012d, Aggarwal & Keenan 2012e, Aggarwal & Keenan 2012c, Aggarwal & Keenan 2013b, Aggarwal & Keenan 2013c.…”
Section: Electron-ion Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%