2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03770.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy levels, lifetimes and branch fractions for Fe XI

Abstract: We present transition energies, probabilities and branching ratios for the electric dipole allowed (E1) and forbidden (M1, E2, M2) lines of the 3s23p4, 3s3p5 and 3s23p33d configurations of Fe xi. Large‐scale multiconfiguration Dirac–Fock wavefunctions are applied to include the effects of relativity, correlation and rearrangement of the electron density consistently within the same (computational) model. From the transition probabilities, lifetimes of the 46 lowest‐lying excited levels are derived, and the pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the time being, we quote the result with an overall uncertainty that corresponds to about three times the statistical uncertainty. Yet another 3d level, 3 G 5 , has been predicted to feature a lifetime near 100 ms (Mason and Nussbaumer 1977, Bhatia and Doschek 1996, Fritzsche et al 2000. This level radiates at two wavelengths (154 and 432 nm) that are not covered here.…”
Section: Data Evaluation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the time being, we quote the result with an overall uncertainty that corresponds to about three times the statistical uncertainty. Yet another 3d level, 3 G 5 , has been predicted to feature a lifetime near 100 ms (Mason and Nussbaumer 1977, Bhatia and Doschek 1996, Fritzsche et al 2000. This level radiates at two wavelengths (154 and 432 nm) that are not covered here.…”
Section: Data Evaluation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The additional evidence from the data channels between ion expulsion and fresh injection points to the longer lifetime value. However, this decay component probably represents two levels ( 3 G 4 and 1 G 4 ), with major decay branches near 274 and 279 nm, respectively, and predicted lifetimes that range from 80 and 46 ms (Mason and Nussbaumer 1977) to 43 and 16 ms (Fritzsche et al 2000). The experimental result points to the first (and earlier) calculation; however, it is practically impossible to separate, in the multi-exponential decay curve analysis, two decay components that differ in their characteristic time constant by only a factor of two-while a third component and some background contribution are present as well.…”
Section: Data Evaluation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To keep the present computations feasible and to include the lifetime interference effects, we limited ourselves to the contributions of a few strong mixing configurations in the representation of both the intermediate and final states (see below). No attempt has been made to incorporate all (virtual) single and double excitations within the 4l and 5l layer as it became a standard for the computation of oscillator strengths and lifetimes in recent years (Fritzsche et al 2000a(Fritzsche et al , 2000b. For several open shells such a systematic treatment results in wavefunction expansions which are infeasible until now.…”
Section: Mcdf Calculations Of Auger Electron Energies and Amplitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory [123] suggests that these belong to intercombination decays of sextet levels in P-like ions. Decays of three 3d J = 7/2 levels in such P-like ions have been discussed in [60], and the corresponding levels in S-like ions have been discussed in [124]. These levels are long lived because they differ by more than two units in total angular momentum from the J = 3/2 ground state, and thus they cannot decay there by an electric dipole transition.…”
Section: Cumentioning
confidence: 99%