2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta01554b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-level modulation of non-fullerene acceptors to achieve high-efficiency polymer solar cells at a diminished energy offset

Abstract: A non-fullerene acceptor ITTIC is developed for polymer solar cells with a donor polymer PBDB-T1. A high PCE of 9.12% was obtained with an energy loss of 0.54 eV at a diminished donor/acceptor energy offset.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the minimal sufficient value of this energetic offset is constantly being updated. Especially with the emergence of nonfullerene acceptors, quantitative study of the driving forces of exciton dissociation has become a hot research topic . Exciton dissociation at the donor‐acceptor interface generally results in a bound charge‐transfer state (CTS), in which the electron and hole are spatially bound to the acceptor and donor.…”
Section: Working Mechanism and Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the minimal sufficient value of this energetic offset is constantly being updated. Especially with the emergence of nonfullerene acceptors, quantitative study of the driving forces of exciton dissociation has become a hot research topic . Exciton dissociation at the donor‐acceptor interface generally results in a bound charge‐transfer state (CTS), in which the electron and hole are spatially bound to the acceptor and donor.…”
Section: Working Mechanism and Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a comparison, PBDB‐T:ITIC based devices exhibited a voltage of 0.93 V and a PCE of 10.6%. Chen and Li et al incorporated thiophene bridge between the electron‐donating part and electron‐withdrawing part of ITIC to tune the energy levels (ITTIC) . This change simultaneously lifted both HOMO and LUMO levels, while narrowing its optical bandgap.…”
Section: High‐performance Oscs With Non‐fullerene Acceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] However, this leads to large energy losses (>0.60 eV), as defined by E loss = E g opt − qV oc , (E g opt is the optical bandgap, V oc is the open-circuit voltage, and q is elementary charge), and limits the power conversion efficiency (PCE) to less than 12% [9][10][11][12][13][14] after decades of effort. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] For such a material combination, a large ΔE LUMO always exists, which reduces the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) offset [ΔE HOMO = E HOMO(D) − E HOMO(A) ] to minimize energy loss [34][35][36][37] while enhancing the light collection in near-infrared (NIR) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] To form a complementary absorption, current popular NFA OSCs are based on the combination of a widebandgap donor and a narrow-bandgap acceptor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%