2018
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2017.2786343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Latency Tradeoff for Energy-Aware Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
242
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 485 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
242
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These challenges have yet to be addressed in the literature, especially in heterogeneous IIoT. Although there are extensive works about resource scheduling in MEC [10]- [12], the joint optimization for bandwidth, computing, and energy intake/output is of insufficient study. Offline algorithm for the joint optimization would require complete non-causal information of networks and may suffer from the curse of dimensionality when the system is in large scale.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges have yet to be addressed in the literature, especially in heterogeneous IIoT. Although there are extensive works about resource scheduling in MEC [10]- [12], the joint optimization for bandwidth, computing, and energy intake/output is of insufficient study. Offline algorithm for the joint optimization would require complete non-causal information of networks and may suffer from the curse of dimensionality when the system is in large scale.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where κ is a coefficient depending on the chip architecture [11]. Thus, the objective of each worker i is to maximize the following utility function:…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…λ i = q i 2κc 2 i . Then, we equate the first derivative given in (11) to zero to derive the value of Lagrange multiplier, α, at the optimal point as:…”
Section: Appendix a Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume that all of the PUs offload their computation tasks to the MEC server for executing, each SU can offload the computation task or compute locally. Similar to other works, we consider always having tasks arriving at the MEC server to be completed, thus the workload arriving model if full‐loaded model. We denote amifalse{0,1false},m,i as the offloading decision of SU m i .…”
Section: System Model and Offloading Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%