1973
DOI: 10.2307/1366564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Intake by Hydropenic Chipping Sparrows (Spizella passerina passerina) Maintained on Different Diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that by hour 18 of water restriction, WR birds had engaged physiological or behavioral strategies to minimize water loss, reducing the need to elevate metabolic water production and allowing them to spare protein in favor of fat catabolism. Depending on the conditions causing dehydration, birds can reduce water loss by retaining feces in the digestive tract longer to increase water reabsorption or by using adaptive hyperthermy to reduce water lost through evaporative cooling, among other strategies ( Arad et al, 1987 ; Brischoux et al, 2020 ; Gerson et al, 2019 ; Moldenhauer and Taylor, 1973 ; Goldstein and Braun, 1988 ). It should be noted, however, that absolute rates of EWL were higher for both control and WR birds during experiment 2, likely because the respirometry trial was conducted during the day when RMR is greater or because the duration was too short for birds to reach RMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that by hour 18 of water restriction, WR birds had engaged physiological or behavioral strategies to minimize water loss, reducing the need to elevate metabolic water production and allowing them to spare protein in favor of fat catabolism. Depending on the conditions causing dehydration, birds can reduce water loss by retaining feces in the digestive tract longer to increase water reabsorption or by using adaptive hyperthermy to reduce water lost through evaporative cooling, among other strategies ( Arad et al, 1987 ; Brischoux et al, 2020 ; Gerson et al, 2019 ; Moldenhauer and Taylor, 1973 ; Goldstein and Braun, 1988 ). It should be noted, however, that absolute rates of EWL were higher for both control and WR birds during experiment 2, likely because the respirometry trial was conducted during the day when RMR is greater or because the duration was too short for birds to reach RMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%