Progress and Visions in Quantum Theory in View of Gravity 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38941-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Inequalities in Interacting Quantum Field Theories

Abstract: The classical energy conditions, originally motivated by the Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems of general relativity, are violated by quantum fields. A reminiscent notion of such conditions are the so called quantum energy inequalities (QEIs), which are however not known to hold generally in quantum field theory.Here we present first steps towards investigating QEIs in quantum field theories with self-interaction. IntroductionOne of the fundamental observables both in quantum and in classical field theory i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, one uses the divergencefreeness of the expected stress-energy tensor, as mentioned in Section 3. Furthermore, one can use (A.6) and (A 16[34] to conclude that pW pu ' vqΩ, HW pu ' vqΩq " 1 2 pxu, Quy `xv, vyq , (A.72) a well-known result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, one uses the divergencefreeness of the expected stress-energy tensor, as mentioned in Section 3. Furthermore, one can use (A.6) and (A 16[34] to conclude that pW pu ' vqΩ, HW pu ' vqΩq " 1 2 pxu, Quy `xv, vyq , (A.72) a well-known result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While there are numerous results on QWEIs and also averaged energy inequalities for linear quantum field theories, including such on general spacetimes, there is apparently little on locally averaged lower bounds on energy expectation values for general and interacting quantum field theories. The results in this direction so far have been relatively sparse [8,7,16],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%