2013
DOI: 10.7566/jpsj.82.114004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Gap at First-Order Quantum Phase Transitions: An Anomalous Case

Abstract: We show that the rate of closing of the energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state, as a function of system size, behaves in many qualitatively different ways at first-order quantum phase transitions of the infiniterange quantum XY model. Examples include polynomial, exponential and even factorially-fast closing of the energy gap, all of which coexist along a single axis of the phase diagram representing the transverse field. This variety emerges depending on whether or not the transverse … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a side remark, we mention that in the {Γ, κ} parameter space, for very small κ ∼ 0 the gap closes very fast to be factorially or exponentially small, without any associated phase transition -this anomalous behaviour has been documented previously in Ref. 24 and relates to the fact a finite number of spins n = 2j cannot exactly represent an irrational value of the variable z = m/j. (In the current context this is not an interesting limit because the problem Hamiltonian vanishes when κ = 0.)…”
Section: Adiabatic Evolution Across the Softened Phase Transitionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a side remark, we mention that in the {Γ, κ} parameter space, for very small κ ∼ 0 the gap closes very fast to be factorially or exponentially small, without any associated phase transition -this anomalous behaviour has been documented previously in Ref. 24 and relates to the fact a finite number of spins n = 2j cannot exactly represent an irrational value of the variable z = m/j. (In the current context this is not an interesting limit because the problem Hamiltonian vanishes when κ = 0.)…”
Section: Adiabatic Evolution Across the Softened Phase Transitionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…From FIG.10 it's seen that reducing κ also lowers the barrier, it becomes completely suppressed only for κ = 0. This limit, however, brings us back to the anomalous case discussed earlier 24 . How does the optimal non-stoquastic driver contribution κ c scale with the system size n = 2j?…”
Section: Adiabatic Evolution Across the Softened Phase Transitionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown explicitly that reverse annealing can turn first order quantum phase transitions into second order transitions in a simple problem, the p-spin model, by choosing an appropriate annealing path. It is generally the case that a first-order quantum phase transition is associated with an exponentially closing energy gap ∆ between the ground state and the first excited state as a function of system size, whereas a second order transition is associated with a polynomially closing gap (though exceptions are known [17][18][19]). On the other hand, according to the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics, the computation time τ is inversely proportional to a small power of the energy gap ∆ [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that QA can follow the instantaneous ground state and find the desired ground state in a polynomial time. In contrast, if a system undergoes a first-order quantum phase transition, the gap often decays exponentially at the transition point [11][12][13], and QA cannot solve the problem efficiently although an anomalous exception is known to exist [14]. Thus, we can estimate the efficiency of QA by analyzing the existence and order of quantum phase transitions, which is reflected in the phase diagram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%