2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy expenditure early after liver transplantation: Better measured than predicted

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
(175 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Korean study reported inaccuracy of predictive equations in liver transplant patients and recommended using IC to avoid over- and underfeeding [ 28 ]. Measured REE was significantly associated with age, sex, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score before liver transplant, surgery time, and graft cold ischemia time on a multiple regression analysis in a cohort of liver transplant patients on postoperative day six [ 29 ]. Given these associations along with directly observed inaccuracy using the Harris–Benedict formula, the authors concluded that fixed factors should not be used to determine energy expenditure and that IC should be used for liver transplant patients.…”
Section: Gold Standard In Icu Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Korean study reported inaccuracy of predictive equations in liver transplant patients and recommended using IC to avoid over- and underfeeding [ 28 ]. Measured REE was significantly associated with age, sex, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score before liver transplant, surgery time, and graft cold ischemia time on a multiple regression analysis in a cohort of liver transplant patients on postoperative day six [ 29 ]. Given these associations along with directly observed inaccuracy using the Harris–Benedict formula, the authors concluded that fixed factors should not be used to determine energy expenditure and that IC should be used for liver transplant patients.…”
Section: Gold Standard In Icu Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent factors associated with the REE measured 6 days after LTx were reported to be the MELD score before the surgery, the surgical time, and the time of cold ischemia 52 . Ferreira et al also identified presurgery mREE values (β = 0.56) and the triceps skinfold thickness (β = 10.84) as predictors of mREE after LTx.…”
Section: Changes In Ree After Ltxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,54 Cross-Sectional Studies Some authors evaluated mREE of LTx patients only after surgery. 55,56 The mREE of 143 patients 52 was assessed within a median time of 6 days after LTx and compared with the pREE (HB) (mean mREE: 1950 ± 461 kcal [24.5 ± 6.1 kcal/kg] and mean pREE: 1695 ± 256 kcal). Only 22% of patients had an mREE within 90%-110% of the pREE, and the mREE ranged from 61% to 195% of the pREE.…”
Section: Longitudinal Assessment Of Ree In Patients Who Underwent Ltxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation