2011
DOI: 10.14429/dsj.61.930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Expenditure and Nutritional Status of Sailors and Submarine Crew of the Indian Navy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst total energy intake was maintained, despite potential limitations from a provision perspective, it was lower than public health guidelines 1 . Nevertheless, data are consistent with some 2 but not all 3 previously reported literature in submariner cohorts. Importantly, the energy requirement of the submariner occupational role has not been defined, therefore future work is required to determine energy expenditure to better inform dietary provision.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Whilst total energy intake was maintained, despite potential limitations from a provision perspective, it was lower than public health guidelines 1 . Nevertheless, data are consistent with some 2 but not all 3 previously reported literature in submariner cohorts. Importantly, the energy requirement of the submariner occupational role has not been defined, therefore future work is required to determine energy expenditure to better inform dietary provision.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our earlier study energy expenditure of Sailors at the ship was found in a range of 2449 kcal/day -4907 kcal/day with a mean of 3313 kcal/day ± 578 kcal/day, while in case of submariners it was 3168 ± 282 (2606-3907) kcal/day 3,10 . The energy expenditure of the MARCOs and divers ranged 3200 kcal/day -4700 kcal/day (mean value 4055 kcal/day ± 465 kcal/day).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In terms of study design, the majority of the studies (12) were cross-sectional [ 10 , 27 30 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 40 , 44 , 45 , 48 ], whereas 3 of them were designed as qualitative [ 39 , 43 , 47 ], three studies as pre-and post/interventional [ 8 , 38 , 42 ], one reported retrospective design with existing data [ 46 ] and 7 studies did not report the study design [ 6 , 26 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 37 , 41 ]. At least two studies applied mixed methodology which probably was presented in separate articles [ 8 , 38 – 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%