2004
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200300918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy–Entropy Compensation in the Transfer of Nonpolar Solutes from Water to Cosolvent/Water Mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
75
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[144][145][146] This is illustrated in Figure 11, where the number of conformations visited during a MD simulation of a polypeptide and of another polymer of equal length are shown. This number grows sublinearly for the b-heptapeptide in methanol and levels off at about 200 conformations (Figure 11 A), whereas the number of visited (relevant) conformations for a poly(hydroxybutanoate) molecule of similar length in chloroform grows linearly with time (Figure 11 B), as would be expected considering the number of possible conformations for either molecule is about 10 9 . The difference is due to the presence of hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor atoms in the b-heptapeptide, which restrict (through favorable hydrogen bonding) the conformational space accessible to the molecule Figure 11.…”
Section: Alleviation Of the Search And Sampling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[144][145][146] This is illustrated in Figure 11, where the number of conformations visited during a MD simulation of a polypeptide and of another polymer of equal length are shown. This number grows sublinearly for the b-heptapeptide in methanol and levels off at about 200 conformations (Figure 11 A), whereas the number of visited (relevant) conformations for a poly(hydroxybutanoate) molecule of similar length in chloroform grows linearly with time (Figure 11 B), as would be expected considering the number of possible conformations for either molecule is about 10 9 . The difference is due to the presence of hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor atoms in the b-heptapeptide, which restrict (through favorable hydrogen bonding) the conformational space accessible to the molecule Figure 11.…”
Section: Alleviation Of the Search And Sampling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The thermodynamic properties, such as energy and density of mixing, are of particular importance when the free energy of solvation and folding of solutes is to be calculated. [8,9,[41][42][43] The properties of a mixture of two solvents need not be a linear function of its composition, as illustrated for water/ dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) mixtures in Figure 9. Only the dielectric permittivity e shows a linear behavior, while the other properties considered show different types of nonlinearity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For processes in which the solvent-solvent energy/enthalpy term is nearly constant, the solute-solvent energy/enthalpy and entropy terms will be representative for for the total energy and entropy terms, respectively. For example, 40,41 the relative contributions of enthalpy and entropy to the free enthalpy of solvation of a series of small solutes in different binary and ternary aqueous solutions could be understood using the solute-solvent energy and entropy terms investigated here. The one-step perturbation approach is a poor approximation to determine entropy differences, even when using it to estimate an entropy difference through determination of the temperature dependence of the corresponding free-energy difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%