2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2017.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy efficient wearable sensor node for IoT-based fall detection systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Power consumption trend of the power saving technique in (Ignjatovic et al, 2012) A brief comparison of the proposed work in this research with the related work mentioned in (Gia et al, 2018), (Lombardo et al, 2012), and (Ignjatovic et al, 2012) is summarized in table 5 Table 5. Comparison between power consumption between proposed system and other systems from literature…”
Section: Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…. Power consumption trend of the power saving technique in (Ignjatovic et al, 2012) A brief comparison of the proposed work in this research with the related work mentioned in (Gia et al, 2018), (Lombardo et al, 2012), and (Ignjatovic et al, 2012) is summarized in table 5 Table 5. Comparison between power consumption between proposed system and other systems from literature…”
Section: Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After running the developed robot that is equipped with the aforementioned Chips, the total sensor power consumption was registered to be around 660µA, and both controllers consumed 3 mA, which summed up to a total of 3.66 mA, compared to the originally needed 340 mAs, the 13.1mA recorded in the work of (Gia et al, 2018), and the 31.65mA consumed in the research in (Lombardo et al, 2012 This is a strong indication that the system's working time per charge went up from 8 hours and 48 minutes to 34 days (816 hours), while the similar technique that was developed in (Gia et al, 2018) made the system operable for 228 hours (9 days and 12 hours), and 106 hours (4 days and 5 hours) for the controlling system in (Ignjatovic et al, 2012). Figure 3 shows the trend of power consumption of the proposed system, while the trend of the power saving technique mentioned in (Gia et al, 2018) is plotted in figure 4, and the trend for the Wireless Filters Monitoring System (WFMS) of power consumption is shown in figure 5.…”
Section: Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations