Energy-efficient LED irradiator for greenhouse cropping

Grechkina, T. V.; Korepanov, V. I.; Omarkhan, A Sh; Туранов, Сергей Борисович

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/156/1/012044

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their analysis and work on the influence of the change of light and dark phases on plants are now an important topic for further study. It has been proved that it is necessary to use installations with an adaptive type of irradiation for different plant species [1]. Thus, for efficient impact on the growth and development of a certain culture it is necessary to create a phytoinstallation with a unique spectral composition depending on the growth period of a particular plant.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of irradiation on the growth and rooting of a climbing rose in vitro

Кондратьева

Bolshin

Krasnolutskaya

et al. 2021

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents the influence of pulsed and continuous irradiation (400…780 nm) on in vitro growth of the climbing rose variety “Camelot” at the illumination of 80±5 mmol/(m2s), temperature - 24±10C, and the relative air humidity - 73±2%. It was found that the experimental led light (LED) pulsed phytoirradiator contributed to a significant increase in the leaf surface area during cultivation of climbing rose microstems in Gamborg’s nutrient medium, the average growth was 2.94 mm2 compared to 2.80 mm2 in the control. Pulse irradiation increases the reproducibility of climbing roses by 1.7 times, and also increases the rooting rate up to 96% compared to 82% in the control. Experimental LED phytoirradiator of continuous irradiation promoted an increase in the leaf surface area growth at the level of the control luminescent phytoirradiator, but also provided a significant increase in the reproduction factor and rooting rate of rose microstems. In the pulsed mode, phytoinstallations consume only 50% of the electricity compared to the continuous irradiation mode.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%