2003
DOI: 10.2172/819468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for Breweries: An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improving energy efficiency, i.e., the reduction of specific energy consumption which we now refer to as energy conservation (EC), is therefore of great importance from a company perspective as it would reduce production costs while increasing productivity and competiveness in the long run (Thollander et al, 2005;Galitsky et al, 2003;Worrell et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving energy efficiency, i.e., the reduction of specific energy consumption which we now refer to as energy conservation (EC), is therefore of great importance from a company perspective as it would reduce production costs while increasing productivity and competiveness in the long run (Thollander et al, 2005;Galitsky et al, 2003;Worrell et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values for carbon dioxide evolved during fermentation were taken from several sources 7,12,22,29,30,31,36,43,46,49 . Steam and electricity generation values were obtained from several literature sources 8,28,36,44,46 . Data was generated for steam and electricity produced using three common brewery fuel sources: coal, petroleum, and natural gas 20,27,48 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data was generated for steam and electricity produced using three common brewery fuel sources: coal, petroleum, and natural gas 20,27,48 . Water and effluent output values generated in the Felgentraeger and Ricketts 24 equations were checked for accuracy with several literature sources for these values 7,8,11,26,28,29,30,32,33,36,46,50 . It is recognized that effluent treatment charges can differ significantly between locations, however here (as elsewhere) our models are making comparisons on a single location scenario.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All major brewers have developed corporate sustainability statements detailing significant energy reduction as a key production target with positive results 1,13,17,28,30 . Wort boiling continues to be targeted for energy saving, using many different methods including vapour heat recovery, thermal/mechanical vapour recompression and absorption refrigeration.…”
Section: Energy Usagementioning
confidence: 99%