2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy efficiency evaluation for machining systems through virtual part

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially for the manufacturing process, a considerable amount of researches focus on energy monitoring, modeling, and energy-saving methods [25][26][27][28][29][30]. Various previous studies indicate that the energy efficiency of machining is not high enough [31][32][33], which is generally lower than thirty percent [34,35]. Hence, the potential of energy-saving for machining process is very considerable [36].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for the manufacturing process, a considerable amount of researches focus on energy monitoring, modeling, and energy-saving methods [25][26][27][28][29][30]. Various previous studies indicate that the energy efficiency of machining is not high enough [31][32][33], which is generally lower than thirty percent [34,35]. Hence, the potential of energy-saving for machining process is very considerable [36].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Running status acquisition is a precondition to determine the influence of running statuses on carbon emission of machine tools [37]. For some CNC machine tools, running statuses can be obtained from CNC systems though computer communication technology if its communication protocol is open.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in one year, a machine tool emits CO 2 equivalent to 61 sports utility vehicles [9]. Machine tools are enlisted as one of the critical products in the European Union's Eco-design directive 2009/125/EC to meet the carbon emission standard [10]. The literature reveals that the average energy efficiency of the machine tools is less than 30% [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…γ c(10) where C p is a constant and α, β and γ are coefficients of cutting speed, feed rate and cutting depth respectively. In the constant-power consumption machining process, the process parameters i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%