2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy, economic and emissions avoided contribution of domestic solar water heating systems for Mexico, Costa Rica and the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the consumption of natural gas related to water heating is the most significant driver of GHG emissions in Isidro Fabela, with 1356 kg CO 2 eq (50%) (2169 kg CO 2 eq [40%] in Mexico City). Therefore, this finding agrees with past GHG assessments in residential buildings [35,49,50] that found that solar water heaters offer the best GHG mitigation potential in Mexico City [18,40,41,50]. The cold mornings in Mexico City increase the demand for hot water, which complicates the ability of families to save natural gas for daily showers.…”
Section: Life-cycle Assessment and Ghg Emissionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Interestingly, the consumption of natural gas related to water heating is the most significant driver of GHG emissions in Isidro Fabela, with 1356 kg CO 2 eq (50%) (2169 kg CO 2 eq [40%] in Mexico City). Therefore, this finding agrees with past GHG assessments in residential buildings [35,49,50] that found that solar water heaters offer the best GHG mitigation potential in Mexico City [18,40,41,50]. The cold mornings in Mexico City increase the demand for hot water, which complicates the ability of families to save natural gas for daily showers.…”
Section: Life-cycle Assessment and Ghg Emissionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The energy mix model sees households choose their energy sources through a portfolio or menu. The options of this portfolio or menu can be arranged either based on economic, cultural, and personal criteria [141]. Heltberg [127] emphasizes that the options of such portfolios or menus can be categorized because of their size, composition and diversification.…”
Section: Energy MIX Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most Mexican households use fuelwood and LPG simultaneously for maintaining their daily energy requirements. Some households even start using more traditional energy sources and cooking appliances not because of deterioration of their financial circumstances but because of the impact of cultural and personal factors [141]. All the aforementioned factors attest to the fact that the emergence of a new technologically advanced energy source, e.g., LPG, does not necessarily put an end to the usage of more conventional sources in households.…”
Section: Critique Of the Energy Ladder Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lama et al estimated the job opportunities, the contribution of local entities, and the transfer of knowledge and skills with financial support from Chinese enterprises for solar energy in Sub-Saharan Africa [ 27 ]. García-Valladares and Ituna-Yudonago assessed the carbon footprint and economic co-benefits from solar energy for water heating systems in residential buildings in Mexico, Costa Rica, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) [ 28 ]. Ren et al looked at using the hybrid PV-battery system in residential units, showing that the households would effectively contribute to the self-consumption of on-site electricity generation or improve grid load control by providing additional grid electrical peak demand while improving the air quality, energy security, and load reduction [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%