“…Hybrid energy absorbers, which subject the same thin-walled structures to more ideal cutting, splitting and tearing-based deformation modes [ 21 , 35 , 36 ], have recently emerged as promising, higher-capacity alternatives to axial crushing which can eliminate the dangerous and notoriously challenging fluctuations in the force response associated with this technology. Notable examples include combined metal/CFRP structures [ 30 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], compounded axial splitting/expansion [ 40 , 41 , 42 ], expansion/shrinking [ 43 ], splitting/shrinking [ 44 , 45 ] and axial cutting/radial clamping [ 46 , 47 ]. The latter deformation mode can meet and/or exceed the energy-absorbing capacity of the traditional axial crushing mode while simultaneously improving the force efficiency (i.e., reducing reaction force fluctuations) by a factor of 2 for sacrificial AA6061 energy-absorbing structures [ 48 ].…”