2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(99)00030-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy dissipating restrainers for highway bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Togaonkar and Jangid [7] evaluated the performance of three span continuous deck bridges using linear and non-linear model of elastomeric bearing to show that these bearings are quite effective in reducing the seismic response of the bridges. Kim et al [8] studied the response of highway bridges with energy dissipating restrainers. Hwang and Sheng [9] evaluated specified effective stiffness and equivalent damping ratio for an equivalent elastic system of isolated bridges and proposed empirical formulae for calculations of the equivalent period shift and equivalent damping ratio of equivalent system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Togaonkar and Jangid [7] evaluated the performance of three span continuous deck bridges using linear and non-linear model of elastomeric bearing to show that these bearings are quite effective in reducing the seismic response of the bridges. Kim et al [8] studied the response of highway bridges with energy dissipating restrainers. Hwang and Sheng [9] evaluated specified effective stiffness and equivalent damping ratio for an equivalent elastic system of isolated bridges and proposed empirical formulae for calculations of the equivalent period shift and equivalent damping ratio of equivalent system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) When the nonlinearity of the restraining devices is considered (model 4), the seismic response of the bottom section of the movable piers is smaller or similar with that in the case when the elasticity of restraining devices is considered; the seismic response of the bottom section of the fixed piers is slightly larger than that in the case when the elasticity of restraining devices is considered due to the fact that the restraining devices are in nonlinear stage which limits the bearing of seismic force by movable supports. The restrainers should be designed energy intensive to protect the movable pier from being destroyed by the violet pounding force, so model 4 was suggested in practice [14][15][16]. The bump rubber can be also used to decrease the pounding force.…”
Section: Comparison Of Calculated Moment and Curvature Of The Bottom mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the earlier research on elastic and elastic-gap stiffening systems include the study of the base-isolated beams bumping against stops with elastic force-displacement relationships [9] where the behavior of such systems was investigated as a function of gap size and stop stiffness, behavior of piping systems with elastic-plastic-gap supports [10], dynamics of seismic impacts on base-isolated structures [11], inelastic seismic response of stiffening systems [12] and investigation of the benefits of energy-dissipating restrainers for highway bridges [13] .…”
Section: Earlier Applications Of Elastic/elastic-gap Stiffening Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%