Reaction Dynamics 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3557-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Disposal by Chemical Reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 323 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 In general, our results confirm that at the TS the CsF bond has been broken to a greater extent than the CsH bond, but these bond orders, see Table 9, are closer together than those of previous studies. 3,14 The HsF bond has been formed to an extent of 0.3 or less, depending on the level of theory. The double CdC bond has formed by about onethird.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…40 In general, our results confirm that at the TS the CsF bond has been broken to a greater extent than the CsH bond, but these bond orders, see Table 9, are closer together than those of previous studies. 3,14 The HsF bond has been formed to an extent of 0.3 or less, depending on the level of theory. The double CdC bond has formed by about onethird.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a test case for comparison of DFT and ab initio methods, we selected the 1,2-HF/DF elimination from 1,1,1-trifluoroethane-d 0 ,-d 3 . This unimolecular dehydrohalogenation reaction has been thoroughly studied by thermal and chemical activation methods, 3 and because it contains three fluorines, it is similar to the trifluoroalkanes, trifluoro alcohols, and trifluoroethers we will be investigating and, also it should be a more stringent test of the computational methods than either fluoro-or difluoroethane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the HO-NO and HO-CIO potential surfaces will not be identical and that part of the energy disposal associated with the separation of the products can be quite different. 29…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surprisal is defined as I ( v ) = −ln­[ P ( v )/ P 0 ( v )] and surprisal plots show I ( v ) vs f v = E v /⟨ E av ⟩. Vibrational surprisal plots are usually linear for H atom abstraction reactions, ( f v ) = λ v 0 + λ v f v ; the slope, λ v , is a global measure of the deviation from the statistical prediction, and the intercept provides estimation for the P v ( v = 0) population. One advantage from observation of HOD is that modeling the 2400–2900 cm –1 spectrum provides an experimental estimation of populations of v 3 = 0 states, which can be used to test the estimates from surprisal analysis.…”
Section: Methods Of Spectra Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%