Abstract:[1] We report in situ observations from the Cluster and FAST spacecraft showing the deposition of energy into the auroral ionosphere from broadband ULF waves in the cusp and low-latitude boundary layer. A comparison of the wave Poynting flux with particle energy and flux at both satellites indicates that energy transfer from the broadband waves to the plasma occurs through field-aligned electron acceleration, transverse ion acceleration, and Joule heating. These processes are shown to result in precipitating e… Show more
“…The most likely source of the upgoing short duration electron beams inside the electron edge is a wave-particle interaction process. For example, it has been suggested that electrons could be trapped in the parallel electric fields associated with kinetic Alfvén waves and propagate with these waves (Chaston et al, 2005). A parallel electric field existing below the spacecraft and accelerating electrons is also a possible explanation (e.g., Paschmann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Plasma Population Inside The Electron Edgementioning
Abstract. The nature of particle precipitations at dayside mid-altitudes can be interpreted in terms of the evolution of reconnected field lines. Due to the difference between electron and ion parallel velocities, two distinct boundary layers should be observed at mid-altitudes between the boundary between open and closed field lines and the injections in the cusp proper. At lowest latitudes, the electrondominated boundary layer, named the "electron edge" of the Low-Latitude Boundary Layer (LLBL), contains softmagnetosheath electrons but only high-energy ions of plasma sheet origin. A second layer, the LLBL proper, is a mixture of both ions and electrons with characteristic magnetosheath energies. The Cluster spacecraft frequently observe these two boundary layers. We present an illustrative example of a Cluster mid-altitude cusp crossing with an extended electron edge of the LLBL. This electron edge contains 10-200 eV, low-density, isotropic electrons, presumably originating from the solar wind halo population. These are occasionally observed with bursts of parallel and/or anti-paralleldirected electron beams with higher fluxes, which are possibly accelerated near the magnetopause X-line. We then use 3 years of data from mid-altitude cusp crossings (327 events) to carry out a statistical study of the location and size of the electron edge of the LLBL. We find that the equatorward boundary of the LLBL electron edge is observed at 10:00-17:00 magnetic local time (MLT) and is located typically between 68 • and 80 • invariant latitude (ILAT). The location of the electron edge shows a weak, but significant, dependence on some of the external parameters (solar wind pressure, and IMF B Z -component), in agreement with expectations from previous studies of the cusp location. The latitudinal extent of the electron edge has been estimated using new multi-spacecraft techniques. The Cluster tetrahedron crosses the electron and ion boundaries of the LLBL/cusp Correspondence to: Y. V. Bogdanova (jb@mssl.ucl.ac.uk) with time delays of 1-40 min between spacecraft. We reconstruct the motion of the electron boundary between observations by different spacecraft to improve the accuracy of the estimation of the boundary layer size. In our study, the LLBL electron edge is distinctly observed in 87% of mid-altitude LLBL/cusp crossings with clear electron and ion equatorward boundaries equivalent to 35% of all LLBL/cusp crossings by Cluster. The size of this region varied between 0 • -2 • ILAT with a median value of 0.2 • ILAT. Generally, the size of the LLBL electron edge depends on the combination of many parameters. However, we find an anti-correlation between the size of this region and the strength of the IMF, the absolute values of the IMF B Y -and B Z -components and the solar wind dynamic pressure, as is expected from a simple reconnection model for the origin of this region.
“…The most likely source of the upgoing short duration electron beams inside the electron edge is a wave-particle interaction process. For example, it has been suggested that electrons could be trapped in the parallel electric fields associated with kinetic Alfvén waves and propagate with these waves (Chaston et al, 2005). A parallel electric field existing below the spacecraft and accelerating electrons is also a possible explanation (e.g., Paschmann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Plasma Population Inside The Electron Edgementioning
Abstract. The nature of particle precipitations at dayside mid-altitudes can be interpreted in terms of the evolution of reconnected field lines. Due to the difference between electron and ion parallel velocities, two distinct boundary layers should be observed at mid-altitudes between the boundary between open and closed field lines and the injections in the cusp proper. At lowest latitudes, the electrondominated boundary layer, named the "electron edge" of the Low-Latitude Boundary Layer (LLBL), contains softmagnetosheath electrons but only high-energy ions of plasma sheet origin. A second layer, the LLBL proper, is a mixture of both ions and electrons with characteristic magnetosheath energies. The Cluster spacecraft frequently observe these two boundary layers. We present an illustrative example of a Cluster mid-altitude cusp crossing with an extended electron edge of the LLBL. This electron edge contains 10-200 eV, low-density, isotropic electrons, presumably originating from the solar wind halo population. These are occasionally observed with bursts of parallel and/or anti-paralleldirected electron beams with higher fluxes, which are possibly accelerated near the magnetopause X-line. We then use 3 years of data from mid-altitude cusp crossings (327 events) to carry out a statistical study of the location and size of the electron edge of the LLBL. We find that the equatorward boundary of the LLBL electron edge is observed at 10:00-17:00 magnetic local time (MLT) and is located typically between 68 • and 80 • invariant latitude (ILAT). The location of the electron edge shows a weak, but significant, dependence on some of the external parameters (solar wind pressure, and IMF B Z -component), in agreement with expectations from previous studies of the cusp location. The latitudinal extent of the electron edge has been estimated using new multi-spacecraft techniques. The Cluster tetrahedron crosses the electron and ion boundaries of the LLBL/cusp Correspondence to: Y. V. Bogdanova (jb@mssl.ucl.ac.uk) with time delays of 1-40 min between spacecraft. We reconstruct the motion of the electron boundary between observations by different spacecraft to improve the accuracy of the estimation of the boundary layer size. In our study, the LLBL electron edge is distinctly observed in 87% of mid-altitude LLBL/cusp crossings with clear electron and ion equatorward boundaries equivalent to 35% of all LLBL/cusp crossings by Cluster. The size of this region varied between 0 • -2 • ILAT with a median value of 0.2 • ILAT. Generally, the size of the LLBL electron edge depends on the combination of many parameters. However, we find an anti-correlation between the size of this region and the strength of the IMF, the absolute values of the IMF B Y -and B Z -components and the solar wind dynamic pressure, as is expected from a simple reconnection model for the origin of this region.
“…The conclusion from that paper was that particle fluxes seen by Cluster in the exterior cusp were enough to heat the F layer, while the Poynting flux was more than enough to account for the Joule heating in the E ionospheric layer. Also, Chaston et al (2005) studied a conjunction between Cluster and FAST satellite, and a conclusion was, after a comparison of the Poynting and particle fluxes, that the energy deposition to the dayside auroral oval was due to field-aligned electron acceleration, transverse ion-acceleration, and Joule heating.…”
Section: T žIvković Et Al: Energy Deposition Through the Cuspmentioning
Abstract. We investigate energy fluxes and small, kilometrescale Birkeland currents in the magnetospheric cusp at a 1-3 Earth radii altitude and in the ionosphere using satellites when they were, according to the Tsyganenko model, in magnetic conjunction within 50-60 km and up to 15 min apart. We use Cluster and CHAMP satellites, and study three conjunction events that occurred in 2008 and 2009, when the Cluster spacecraft were crossing the cusps at only a few Earth radii altitude. Our goal is to understand better the influence of processes in the magnetospheric cusp on the upper thermosphere and its upwelling which was usually observed by the CHAMP satellite passing the cusp. Three studied events occurred under relatively quiet and steady magnetospheric and ionospheric conditions, which explains why observed thermospheric density enhancements were rather low. Our findings point out that for each studied event soft electron precipitation influences thermospheric density enhancements in a way that stronger electron precipitation produces stronger thermospheric upwelling. Therefore, in the case of these weak events, soft electron precipitation seems to be more important cause of the observed, thermospheric density enhancements than is the Joule heating.
“…The utility of WT in space physics problems has been demonstrated by a growing number of authors [e.g., Muret and Omidi, 1995;Lui and Najmi, 1997;Gedalin et al, 1998;Lundstedt et al, 2005]. Recently, WT have been applied to the study of ULF waves either from space [Chaston et al, 2005] or from the ground [Waters, 2000]. However, there has not been so far a systematic study of the advantages and/or disadvantages of the WT over the usual FT in the determination of FLRs.…”
[1] Fourier transforms have traditionally been used in the past for time-frequency analysis of numerous physical problems. Recently, a new time-frequency analysis technique using temporally confined base functions, called wavelets, has been applied to many problems. The advantage of the wavelets over the conventional sinusoidal functions is their time localization property, providing information not only about the frequency or scale size of the features present but also about their location in the time series. Here we compare the performance of the two techniques on the time-frequency analysis of ground magnetometer data and especially their ability to pick up the field line resonance (FLR) frequency of a resonating magnetic field line using automated FLR determination techniques. We find that the automated techniques work better with the Fourier transforms giving less variable FLR frequency. The high temporal resolution of the wavelet transforms can be useful for detailed analyses of short time periods, but it becomes a disadvantage when it comes to automated techniques for the entire dayside magnetosphere, yielding a highly variable FLR frequency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.