1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.48.12425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy dependence of the outer core-level multiplet structures in atomic Mn and Mn-containing compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
45
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis supports their interpretation and provides a quantitative understanding of differences and similarities between the XPS for the isolated atom and for MnO; we apply this analysis to examine aspects of the data in Hermsmeier et al 30 The first XPS peak appears to have a very similar FWHM for Mn gas, MnF 2 , and MnO, consistent, as we argued above, with the origin of this peak as a spin-orbit-split Russell-Saunders 7 P, multiplet. If the small broadening of this peak for MnO 6 over that for Mn 2+ , which we have ascribed to additional splittings in the O h * double group, were also found in their MnF 2 and MnO spectra, this would lend strong support to our analysis.…”
Section: Mn͑2+͒supporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our analysis supports their interpretation and provides a quantitative understanding of differences and similarities between the XPS for the isolated atom and for MnO; we apply this analysis to examine aspects of the data in Hermsmeier et al 30 The first XPS peak appears to have a very similar FWHM for Mn gas, MnF 2 , and MnO, consistent, as we argued above, with the origin of this peak as a spin-orbit-split Russell-Saunders 7 P, multiplet. If the small broadening of this peak for MnO 6 over that for Mn 2+ , which we have ascribed to additional splittings in the O h * double group, were also found in their MnF 2 and MnO spectra, this would lend strong support to our analysis.…”
Section: Mn͑2+͒supporting
confidence: 83%
“…For Mn gas, peak 2 is a separate peak at 3.1 eV from the main peak, while from our calculations for isolated Mn 2+ , the separation of the centers of peaks 1 and 2 is ⌬E = 3.9 eV. As we explained above, our ⌬E is too large because we have not correctly described the separations of the 3d 5 muliplet couplings to 6 S, 4 P, and 4 P. However, Hermsmeier et al 30 find that this ⌬E becomes smaller for the compounds; it remains a separate peak for MnF 2 but it is only a shoulder on peak 1 for MnO. We have shown that ⌬E is reduced from the cation to MnO because the covalent character of the d orbitals leads to a smaller exchange integral, K͑3p ,3d͒; see Table II.…”
Section: Mn͑2+͒mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous photoemission studies on transition metal compounds reveal core-level multiplet structures that are best understood in terms of configuration-interaction (CI) calculations including intrashell electron correlation, charge-transfer and final-state screening. [3][4][5] In addition, these multiplet structures are also strongly influenced by covalency and ligand coordination. [6,7] The This paper presents the results of a systematic study of the 3s and 3p core-level photoemission, and satellite structures for Mn oxo-bridged compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%