Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.165329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy dependence of quantum dot formation by ion sputtering

Abstract: Ordered quantum dot patterns are generated on GaSb and InSb surfaces due to a surface instability induced by Ar ϩ -ion sputtering at normal incidence. The characteristic length of the generated patterns scales with the square root of the ion energy over the energy range of 75-1800 eV. This energy dependence is compared to the solutions of the isotropic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation and allows the determination of the lateral width of the energy distribution deposited by the incident ions in the very-low-energy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
74
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(22 reference statements)
9
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining defects dissolve for longer simulation times and the surface converges to a perfect hexagonal arrangement. Besides the qualitative similarity of the resulting pattern in comparison with experimentally observed dot morphologies, we can also notice a quantitative agreement: the aspect ratio has a value of = 0.76 (A = 6.62 and L = 8.74) and is therefore comparable to the dot morphologies found on binary compounds [6][7][8][9][10][11] and by irradiation with heavy Bi-(cluster)-ions [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Since we had to use the same scales forĥ and x in (46), the aspect ratio is a characteristic quantity of the model equation (47), which cannot be adjusted by rescaling the height or the lateral extent.…”
Section: Influence Of Redeposition On the Pattern Formationsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining defects dissolve for longer simulation times and the surface converges to a perfect hexagonal arrangement. Besides the qualitative similarity of the resulting pattern in comparison with experimentally observed dot morphologies, we can also notice a quantitative agreement: the aspect ratio has a value of = 0.76 (A = 6.62 and L = 8.74) and is therefore comparable to the dot morphologies found on binary compounds [6][7][8][9][10][11] and by irradiation with heavy Bi-(cluster)-ions [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Since we had to use the same scales forĥ and x in (46), the aspect ratio is a characteristic quantity of the model equation (47), which cannot be adjusted by rescaling the height or the lateral extent.…”
Section: Influence Of Redeposition On the Pattern Formationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…While the first experiments can be dated back to 1962 [5], a new impetus was given in 1999, when Facsko et al discovered the self-organized formation of hexagonally arranged nanodot structures on semiconductor surfaces by lowenergy ion-beam erosion at normal incidence [6]. Since then, numerous experiments have been carried out which can essentially be categorized into three groups: (i) lowenergy erosion of III-V semiconductor compounds [6][7][8][9][10][11]; (ii) erosion of Ge with heavy ions or ion clusters [12][13][14][15][16][17] and (iii) low-energy erosion of Si with additional metal co-deposition [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last five years, however, spectacularly novel experimental results have been reported by Facsko et al 4,5,6,7 showing that GaSb and InSb semiconductor targets eroded by Ar + ions under normal incidence can develop into a rather well ordered surface morphology with basically hexagonally arranged dot structures. Similar results have been subsequently reported by Gago et al 8 for Si targets under normal incidence and, more generally, by Frost et al 9,10,11 for rotated InP, InSb and GaSb targets under oblique incidence (where as function of the inclination angle a variety of other patterns have also been observed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in a review article by Valbusa et al [8], subsequently, many groups picked up these investigations-not only with (reactive) ion-beam machines, but also with (reactive) ion etching (RIE). Those investigations were usually not performed with amorphous glass, but rather for semiconductors or even metals [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The phenomenon observed and described in all of these publications is self-organization due to two compensating effects, which together stabilize the surface profile: first a tendency of surface structure shrinkage due to a preferred etch erosion at oblique flanks and secondly diffusion of the eroded particles into the etched depressions 2 Advances in OptoElectronics and adsorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%