2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2019.8779400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Density and Hysteresis Comparison in Natural Rubber Tube Springs for Wearable Exoskeleton Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The springs are planar natural rubber sheets, which exhibit low hysteresis (2 to 4% energy loss; figs. S1 and S2), store about 15 times more energy per unit mass than steel springs (20), and allow for a tightly stacked array when used with planar electrodes (figs. S3 to S6).…”
Section: Prototype Actuator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The springs are planar natural rubber sheets, which exhibit low hysteresis (2 to 4% energy loss; figs. S1 and S2), store about 15 times more energy per unit mass than steel springs (20), and allow for a tightly stacked array when used with planar electrodes (figs. S3 to S6).…”
Section: Prototype Actuator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its unique elasticity, a high‐quality NR compound is able to store ≈150 times more energy than the same stored per unit weight of the spring steel. [ 107 ] A well‐designed rubber product can offer a number of ample advantages such as being lightweight, tough, and resistant to nonideal environmental condition. Currently, artificial hearts are being made from rubber materials.…”
Section: Elastomersmentioning
confidence: 99%