Energy costs vs. carbon dioxide emissions in short-term production planning

Dellnitz, Andreas; Braschczok, Damian; Ostmeyer, Jonas; Hilbert, Markus; Kleine, Andreas

doi:10.1007/s11573-020-01000-1

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this research, a systemic literature review was conducted on sustainable production planning studies using a methodology adapted from [13] with the following steps: Based on the above understandings, sustainable production planning aims at decreasing the negative environmental impact while preserving energy for less consumption and a safer economic impact for stakeholders [47]. The indicator categorization shown in Figure 3 is used to classify and discuss the existing literature on sustainable production planning, which enables providing a clear and better understanding of trends and possible shortcomings in the existing literature.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, at least two of these pillars are integrated. consumption and a safer economic impact for stakeholders [47]. The indicator categorization shown in Figure 3 is used to classify and discuss the existing literature on sustainable production planning, which enables providing a clear and better understanding of trends and possible shortcomings in the existing literature.…”

Section: Sustainability Pillars and Their Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They introduced a coherence between production planning presented by lot-sizing and preventive maintenance. Customer Satisfaction [53] Scheduling [7] Lot sizing [50] Other [2] Scheduling [49] Routing [16] Hybrid [69] Hybrid [70] Dispatching [71] Scheduling [47] Hybrid [15] Hybrid [72] Hybrid [31] Aggregate production planning [73] Hybrid [74] Hybrid [75] Dispatching [76] Hybrid [77] Hybrid [78] Hybrid [79] Holistic approach [80] Holistic approach [81] Other [82] Scheduling [83] Scheduling [84] Scheduling [85] Other * Hybrid, more than one production planning problem used, and production planning problem combined with other planning processes; ** Other, other planning operations such as energy planning and shipment planning.…”

Section: Economic Sustainability Pillarmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, China was involved in most of the literature with seven articles. Four articles aimed at integrating the economic and environmental sustainability pillars [49,70,85,86], while three articles were aimed at the environmental sustainability pillar [12,47,57]. The case of Germany was referred to in four articles.…”

Section: International Cases In Production Planning For Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

An Analysis of Research Trends in the Sustainability of Production Planning

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainability has become of great interest in many fields, especially in production systems due to the continual increase in the scarcity of raw materials and environmental awareness. Recent literature has given significant attention to considering the three sustainability pillars (i.e., environmental, economic, and social sustainability) in solving production planning problems. Therefore, the present study conducts a review of the literature on sustainable production planning to analyze the relationships among different production planning problems (e.g., scheduling, lot sizing, aggregate planning, etc.) and the three sustainability pillars. In addition, we analyze the identified studies based on the indicators that define each pillar. The results show that the literature most frequently addresses production scheduling problems while it lacks studies on aggregate production planning problems that consider the sustainability pillars. In addition, there is a growing trend towards obtaining integrated solutions of different planning problems, e.g., combining production planning problems with maintenance planning or energy planning. Additionally, around 45% of the identified studies considered the integration of the economic and the environmental pillars in different production planning problems. In addition, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions are the most frequent sustainability indicators considered in the literature, while less attention has been given to social indicators. Another issue is the low number of studies that have considered all three sustainability pillars simultaneously. The finidings highlight the need for more future research towards holistic sustainable production planning approaches.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sustainability Pillars and Their Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Economic Sustainability Pillarmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: International Cases In Production Planning For Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

An Analysis of Research Trends in the Sustainability of Production Planning

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Eco-Energy-Efficient Simultaneous Lot-Sizing and Scheduling: A Tri-criteria Problem

Hilbert,

Dellnitz,

Kleine

2023

Lecture Notes in Operations Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Production planning under RTP, TOU and PPA considering a redox flow battery storage system

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to climate change and the increasing scarcity of resources, the sustainability performance of companies is increasingly becoming the focus of science and practice. Consequently, bicriteria energy-efficient production planning under price-dynamic electricity tariffs—e.g., real-time-pricing (RTP) or time-of-use (TOU)—is meanwhile well established, often fathoming the tradeoffs between electricity costs of production and another criterion such as makespan. However, tradeoffs between electricity costs and electricity consumption in general are rarely the focus of such analyses. So-called green power purchase agreements (PPAs), which are becoming increasingly popular in the European business community as a means of improving corporate sustainability performance, are also largely ignored. Thus, for the first time in the scientific literature, we put this type of electricity tariff to the test by analyzing the tradeoffs between electricity costs and electricity consumption in a lot-sizing and scheduling context. Here, we additionally consider a real-world redox flow battery storage system that may be the system of the future, which is also new to the literature on lot-sizing and scheduling. Even more: due to the complex nature of our bicriteria mixed-integer problem, we develop and present suitable heuristics. These include an energy-efficient allocation heuristic in the case of PPA and, among others, a fix-relax-and-optimize heuristic combined with a decomposition approach in the case of RTP and TOU. Ultimately, a scenario analysis demonstrates the performance of these heuristics.

show abstract

Energy costs vs. carbon dioxide emissions in short-term production planning

Cited by 8 publications

References 33 publications

An Analysis of Research Trends in the Sustainability of Production Planning

An Analysis of Research Trends in the Sustainability of Production Planning

Eco-Energy-Efficient Simultaneous Lot-Sizing and Scheduling: A Tri-criteria Problem

Production planning under RTP, TOU and PPA considering a redox flow battery storage system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About